Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul:2022:107-116.
doi: 10.1109/icdh55609.2022.00025. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

Using Deep Learning to Identify Linguistic Features that Facilitate or Inhibit the Propagation of Anti- and Pro-Vaccine Content on Social Media

Affiliations

Using Deep Learning to Identify Linguistic Features that Facilitate or Inhibit the Propagation of Anti- and Pro-Vaccine Content on Social Media

Young Anna Argyris et al. 2022 IEEE Int Conf Digit Health IEEE IDCH 2022 (2022). 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Anti-vaccine content is rapidly propagated via social media, fostering vaccine hesitancy, while pro-vaccine content has not replicated the opponent's successes. Despite this disparity in the dissemination of anti- and pro-vaccine posts, linguistic features that facilitate or inhibit the propagation of vaccine-related content remain less known. Moreover, most prior machine-learning algorithms classified social-media posts into binary categories (e.g., misinformation or not) and have rarely tackled a higher-order classification task based on divergent perspectives about vaccines (e.g., anti-vaccine, pro-vaccine, and neutral). Our objectives are (1) to identify sets of linguistic features that facilitate and inhibit the propagation of vaccine-related content and (2) to compare whether anti-vaccine, provaccine, and neutral tweets contain either set more frequently than the others. To achieve these goals, we collected a large set of social media posts (over 120 million tweets) between Nov. 15 and Dec. 15, 2021, coinciding with the Omicron variant surge. A two-stage framework was developed using a fine-tuned BERT classifier, demonstrating over 99 and 80 percent accuracy for binary and ternary classification. Finally, the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count text analysis tool was used to count linguistic features in each classified tweet. Our regression results show that anti-vaccine tweets are propagated (i.e., retweeted), while pro-vaccine tweets garner passive endorsements (i.e., favorited). Our results also yielded the two sets of linguistic features as facilitators and inhibitors of the propagation of vaccine-related tweets. Finally, our regression results show that anti-vaccine tweets tend to use the facilitators, while pro-vaccine counterparts employ the inhibitors. These findings and algorithms from this study will aid public health officials' efforts to counteract vaccine misinformation, thereby facilitating the delivery of preventive measures during pandemics and epidemics.

Keywords: deep-learning; diffusion of information; health informatics; regression analyses; social media; vaccine misinformation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Proposed two-stage architecture for tweet classification.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Comparison between TF features against the fine-tuned BERT features using t-SNE. Observe that the BERT features appear to better discriminate the different classes (0: neutral, 1: pro, −1: anti) compared to the raw TF features.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Proportion of daily vaccine-related tweets classified as pro-, neutral, and anti-vaccine from Nov 15 to Dec 15, 2021.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ortiz RR, Smith A, and Coyne-Beasley T, “A systematic literature review to examine the potential for social media to impact HPV vaccine uptake and awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination,” vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1465–1475, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21645515.2019.1581543?journa... - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh L, Bansal S, Bode L, Budak C, Chi G, Kawintiranon K, Padden C, Vanarsdall R, Vraga E, and Wang Y, “A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on twitter,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13907v1
    1. Argyris YA, Kim Y, Roscizewski A, and Song W, “The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy between maternal engagement with anti- and pro-vaccine social media posts and adolescent HPV-vaccine uptake rates in the US: The perspective of loss aversion in emotion-laden decision circumstances,” vol. 282, p. 114043, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953621003750 - PubMed
    1. “See how vaccinations are going in your county and state,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html
    1. Johnson NF, Velasquez N, Restrepo NJ, Leahy R, Gabriel N, El Oud S, Zheng M, Manrique P, Wuchty S, and Lupu Y, “The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views,” vol. 582, pp. 230–233, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2281-1 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources