A validation study of the Cantonese Chinese version of short form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Cantonese-speaking patients with chronic pain in Hong Kong
- PMID: 37975327
- DOI: 10.1111/papr.13319
A validation study of the Cantonese Chinese version of short form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Cantonese-speaking patients with chronic pain in Hong Kong
Abstract
Objective: The study tests the reliability and validity of the Cantonese Chinese version of Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2-CC).
Methods: The original Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) was translated into Cantonese Chinese version. Cantonese-speaking chronic pain patients from three pain centers in Hong Kong were recruited and asked to complete SF-MPQ-2-CC, validated Chinese versions of Identification Pain questionnaire (ID Pain), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for evaluation of convergent and divergent validity, 2 weeks apart for evaluation of internal consistency.
Results: A total of 333 and 197 participants completed the first and second set of questionnaires, respectively. SF-MPQ-2-CC was shown to have excellent internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha value of 0.933. The overall correlation coefficient was 0.875 that shows good test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, where a seconder-order factor model demonstrated a good fit with our data (χ2 = 826.51, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.908, RMSEA = 0.097; SRMR = 0.063; error terms adjusted). SF-MPQ-2-CC also showed good convergent validity with Chinese versions of ID Pain (neuropathic pain) and PCS (continuous pain), and divergent validity was shown by a negative correlation with Chinese version of SF-36.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that SF-MPQ-2-CC is a valid and reliable pain assessment tool for Cantonese-speaking patients in Hong Kong with a wide range of chronic pain conditions. It also helps to identify the presence of neuropathic pain and negative pain cognition among respondents.
Keywords: Cantonese; Chinese; Short form McGill pain questionnaire; chronic pain; neuropathic pain; psychometric; reliability; validity.
© 2023 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Institute of Pain.
Similar articles
-
Validity, reliability, and assessment sensitivity of the Japanese version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Japanese patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain.Pain Med. 2014 Nov;15(11):1930-7. doi: 10.1111/pme.12468. Epub 2014 Jun 14. Pain Med. 2014. PMID: 24930826
-
Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) in Cantonese-speaking Chinese patients.J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jul 16. J Pain. 2008. PMID: 18632309
-
A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2: Chinese version in patients with chronic visceral pain.J Pain Res. 2017 Jan 5;10:121-128. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S116997. eCollection 2017. J Pain Res. 2017. PMID: 28115872 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Pain-related Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.Clin J Pain. 2021 Jun 1;37(6):454-474. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000933. Clin J Pain. 2021. PMID: 33734148
-
The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in people with cancer: an integrative review.Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Mar;13(1):27-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 May 20. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22341138 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A neuropathic pain scale is effective in identifying neuropathic pain.Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2094-2102. doi: 10.62347/BXRB6015. eCollection 2025. Am J Transl Res. 2025. PMID: 40226007 Free PMC article.
-
Turkish Validity and Reliability of Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 in Patients with Chronic Cervical Radicular Pain Due to Disc Herniation.Arch Rheumatol. 2025 May 30;40(2):249-255. doi: 10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.11133. Arch Rheumatol. 2025. PMID: 40758089 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating pain outcomes in Chinese ophthalmology patients using the APS-POQ-R-C: a Rasch analysis.Front Psychol. 2025 May 5;16:1558111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1558111. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40391110 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161:1976-1982.
-
- Gracely RH. Pain language and evaluation. Pain. 2016;157:1369-1372.
-
- Main CJ. Pain assessment in context: a state of the science review of the McGill pain questionnaire 40 years on. Pain. 2016;157:1387-1399.
-
- Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain. 2009;144:35-42.
-
- Lovejoy TI, Turk DC, Morasco BJ. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised short-form McGill pain questionnaire. J Pain. 2012;13:1250-1257.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous