Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Dec 19;14(6):e0109123.
doi: 10.1128/mbio.01091-23. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis

Affiliations
Editorial

Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis

Carolina Tropini et al. mBio. .

Abstract

There is concern that the time taken to publish academic papers in microbiological science has significantly increased in recent years. While the data do not specifically support this, evidence suggests that editors are having to invite more and more reviewers to identify those willing to perform peer review.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; early career researcher; peer review; peer review crisis; reviewer rewards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The average number of days from receipt to first decision (this includes the time from completion of the final review until the editor sent the decision letter) that a submission spent in peer review prior to publication across nine ASM journals. Error bars indicate standard error.
Fig 2
Fig 2
The average number of days from receipt to first decision (this includes the time from completion of the final review until the editor sent the decision letter) that a submission spent in peer review prior to publication broken out across the nine ASM journals. Error bars indicate standard error.
Fig 3
Fig 3
(A) The number of reviewers N that are contacted per article to be reviewed is increasing. (B) Editors of all career stages, early (postdoctoral or assistant professor), mid (associate professor), and senior (full professor and emeritus) are having to ask more people to review papers. Data from nine ASM journals. Error bars represent standard error. In the legend, n represents the number of editors represented in these categories between the years 2016 and 2022.
Fig 4
Fig 4
The number of reviewers N that are contacted per article to be reviewed across the nine different ASM journals.

References

    1. Gilbert Jack A. 2021. Acknowledgment of mSystems ad hoc reviewers mSystems 7:e01403–21. doi:10.1128/msystems.01097-22 - DOI
    1. Godlee F, Smith J, Marcovitch H. 2011. Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ 342:c7452. doi:10.1136/bmj.c7452 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Check Hayden E. 2012. Study challenges existence of arsenic-based life. Nature Publishing Group UK. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.9861 - DOI
    1. Yong E. 2015. There’s no plague on the NYC subway. No Platypuses either. National Geographic
    1. Forrester N. 2023. “Fed up and burnt out: 'quiet quitting' hits academia”. Nat 615:751–753. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00633-w - DOI - PubMed

Publication types