Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging
- PMID: 3797644
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797644
Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were performed in 29 patients with clinical findings of stage B prostatic carcinoma with use of both T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences. MR imaging findings were correlated with surgical/pathologic results in 18 patients who underwent an operation. Periprostatic fat, periprostatic venous plexus, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes were assessed from MR imaging studies. When each was assessed independently, the periprostatic fat signal had a sensitivity of 29%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 85% in detecting extracapsular tumor extension, whereas the periprostatic venous plexus had a sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 86%, and accuracy of 80%. MR imaging had a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 97%, and accuracy of 89% for detecting seminal vesicular involvement. When all four anatomic features were taken into consideration, MR imaging had an accuracy of 89% (16 of 18 patients) in differentiating stage B from stage C or D disease (sensitivity 87%, specificity 90%). Our data indicate that MR imaging is a promising method for staging prostatic carcinoma.
Similar articles
-
[Staging of prostatic carcinoma. Accuracy of magnetic resonance].Radiol Med. 1987 Sep;74(3):204-8. Radiol Med. 1987. PMID: 3659429 Italian.
-
Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 May;166(5):1157-63. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615261. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8615261
-
Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T.Radiology. 1988 Nov;169(2):339-46. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.2.3174982. Radiology. 1988. PMID: 3174982
-
[MR imaging of prostate cancer].Radiologe. 2003 Jun;43(6):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s00117-003-0906-7. Radiologe. 2003. PMID: 12827261 Review. German.
-
[Staging and tissue characterization of prostate carcinoma: role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopy].Hinyokika Kiyo. 2000 Nov;46(11):855-9. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2000. PMID: 11193312 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.Gut. 1992 Dec;33(12):1587-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.12.1587. Gut. 1992. PMID: 1487158 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer.Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Aug;4(4):257-62. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09103. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010. PMID: 20694103 Free PMC article.
-
Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review.Urol Ann. 2023 Jul-Sep;15(3):249-255. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_170_20. Epub 2023 Jul 17. Urol Ann. 2023. PMID: 37664103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biparametric MRI of the prostate radiomics model for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancers : a two-centre study.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01372-8. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39054441 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.Eur Radiol. 2007 Apr;17(4):1055-65. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0418-8. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17024497 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical