Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;39(8):1708-1714.
doi: 10.1177/02676591231216794. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Influence of minimal invasive extracorporeal circuits on dialysis dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Affiliations

Influence of minimal invasive extracorporeal circuits on dialysis dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Thai Duy Nguyen et al. Perfusion. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac surgery in patients on chronic renal dialysis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circuits (MiECC) have shown a positive impact on patient outcome in different high-risk populations. This retrospective study compares the outcome of these high-risk patients undergoing heart surgery either with a MiECC or a conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC).

Methods: This is a single-center experience including 131 consecutive dialysis dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2006 and December 2016. A propensity score matching was employed leaving 30 matched cases in each group.

Results: After propensity score matching the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the MiECC group (n = 3 (10%) vs n = 10 (33%) in the CECC group, p = .028). Further, intraoperative transfused units of packed red blood cells were lower in the MiECC group (1.4 ± 1.8 units vs 2.8 ± 1.7, p < .001).

Conclusions: There are evident advantages to using MiECC in dialysis dependent patients, especially regarding mortality. These findings necessitate additional research in MiECC usage in high-risk populations.

Keywords: MiECC; cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; dialysis; end stage renal disease; extracorporeal circulation; minimal invasive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Ellam S, Räsänen J, Hartikainen J, et al. Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on perioperative intravenous fluid management in coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion 2021: 2676591211043232. 20210903. DOI: 10.1177/02676591211043232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Essawi A, Breitenbach I, Haupt B, et al. Impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circuits on octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Have we been looking in the wrong direction? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52: 1175–1181. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx156. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berretta P, Cefarelli M, Montecchiani L, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard extracorporeal circulation system in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: a propensity score-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 57: 717–723. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz318. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Condello I, Santarpino G, Bartolomucci F, et al. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation in end-stage coronary artery disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 16: 356. 20211227. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01735-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Essawi A, Abdelhalim A, Groeger S, et al. Predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation persisting beyond hospital discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 2022; 37: 62–68. 20201219. DOI: 10.1177/0267659120978647. - DOI - PubMed