Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;43(1):511-519.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06814-2. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Identification of gene expression biomarkers to predict clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

Identification of gene expression biomarkers to predict clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Andriko Palmowski et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify biomarkers at the gene expression level to predict response to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: MTX-naïve patients with RA were started on MTX and followed up over three months. The disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was used to classify patients into responders and non-responders. Genome-wide gene expression analysis was performed in CD4 + and CD14 + mononuclear cells sampled from whole blood at baseline to identify differentially expressed genes in responders versus non-responders. Gene selection methods and prediction modelling obtained the most relevant differentially expressed genes. A logistic regression prediction model was subsequently constructed and validated via bootstrapping. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was calculated to judge model quality.

Results: Seventy-nine patients with RA (53.4 ± 13.9 years, 74.7% females) were enrolled, and 70 finished the study with a documented treatment EULAR response (77.1% responders). Forty-six differentially expressed genes were found. The most promising genes were KRTAP4-11, LOC101927584, and PECAM1 in CD4 + cells and PSMD5 and ID1 in CD14 + cells. The final prediction model using these genes reached an AUC of 90%; the validation set's AUC was 82%.

Conclusions: Our prediction model constructed via genome-wide gene expression analysis in CD4 + and CD14 + mononuclear cells yielded excellent predictions. Our findings necessitate confirmation in other cohorts of MTX-naïve RA patients. Especially if used in conjunction with previously identified clinical and laboratory (bio)markers, our results could help predict response to MTX in RA to guide treatment decisions. Key Points • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis may or may not respond to treatment with methotrexate, which is the recommended first-line drug in guidelines around the world. • In non-responders, valuable time is lost until second-line treatments are started. • This study aimed at predicting response to methotrexate by identifying differentially expressed genes from peripheral blood samples. • The final prediction model yielded excellent prognostic values, but validation in other cohorts is necessary to corroborate these findings.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Gene signature; Methotrexate; Pharmacogenomics; Prediction; Response; Rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FB reports receiving honoraria and grant/study support from medac, Hexal, and Pfizer. MS and JK have received fees for service and consulting from Charite and medac. AB is an employee of medac GmbH. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient enrolment. Seventy-nine patients were enrolled in this study. *One specimen was analysed via Microarray but excluded because the patient switched from scMTX to oral MTX. MTX, methotrexate
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A In-average ROC of the final prediction model for the training and validation data in the applied resampling method. B Strip plot showing the classification scores of the prediction model with the prediction score closest to the resampling mean score applied to all available samples. R, responder; NR, non-responder
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Validation of microarray data using quantitative PCR. Results obtained via quantitative PCR were correlated to raw microarray data for gene candidates identified as a robust signature for response prediction

References

    1. Weinblatt ME. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a quarter century of development. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2013;124:16–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):685–699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, St. Clair EW, Arayssi T, Carandang K, et al. American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(7):924–39. doi: 10.1002/acr.24596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum: Daten der Kerndokumentation 2019. https://www.drfz.de/wp-content/uploads/ergebnisse-standardprasentation-2... (2019). Accessed January 26th 2022
    1. Romão VC, Canhão H, Fonseca JE. Old drugs, old problems: where do we stand in prediction of rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to methotrexate and other synthetic DMARDs? BMC Med. 2013;11(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed