Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 17;13(1):20157.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47505-x.

Effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination vs. high-intensity statin therapy according to sex in patients with atherosclerosis

Affiliations

Effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination vs. high-intensity statin therapy according to sex in patients with atherosclerosis

Byung Gyu Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the effects of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe) versus high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This was a sex-specific subgroup analysis of the RACING trial that evaluated the interaction between sex and treatment strategies for the primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or nonfatal stroke at 3 years). Of 3780 patients in the RACING trial, 954 (25.2%) were women. Regardless of sex, the effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy on primary outcome compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [0.63-1.52] in women; HR 0.90 [0.71-1.14] in men). The rate of discontinuation or dose reduction of study drugs due to intolerance was lower in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group in both women (4.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.014) and men (4.8% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001). LDL cholesterol levels of < 70 mg/dL at 1, 2, and 3 years were more frequently achieved in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (all P < 0.001) in both sexes. There were no significant interactions between sex and treatment groups regarding the primary outcome, discontinuation, or dose reduction of study drugs, or the proportion of achievement of LDL cholesterol levels < 70 mg/dL. The effect of ezetimibe combination therapy for the 3-year composite outcomes was not different in both men and women. The benefits of ezetimibe combination therapy on LDL cholesterol lowering and drug tolerance were similarly observed regardless of sex.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03044665.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B-KK has received speaker’s fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular, M-KH has received speaker’s fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Pfizer, YJ has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi, and J-SK has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow of participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time-to-event curves of primary outcome in women and men. Kaplan–Meier curves for the primary outcome according to sex and treatment assignment. CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Drug discontinuation or dose reduction due to intolerance in women and men. Rates of discontinuation or dose reduction of the study drug due to intolerance in women (A) and men (B) in the safety population.

References

    1. Catapano AL, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw272. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73:e285–e350. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mach F, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41:111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fulcher J, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: Meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:1397–1405. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61368-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Victor BM, Teal V, Ahedor L, Karalis DG. Gender differences in achieving optimal lipid goals in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014;113:1611–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.018. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data