Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 30;68(3):116-121.
doi: 10.17221/111/2022-VETMED. eCollection 2023 Mar.

The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat

Affiliations

The impact of urine storage methods on the results of quantitative bacterial culture in dog and cat

Ching-Jung Lien et al. Vet Med (Praha). .

Abstract

Quantitative bacterial culture (QBC) is the gold standard for determining urinary tract infections. However, the majority of urine samples were sent to a lab for further bacterial culture. Therefore, the storage condition was vital to maintain the quality and accuracy of the urine samples. The main objective of our study was to examine the urine QBC outcomes of (1) immediate culture, (2) culture after urine sample storage at ambient temperature for 24 h, and (3) culture after urine sample storage at 4 °C for 24 hours. There were 49 feline samples and 30 canine samples included in this study. All QBC samples kept at ambient temperature and refrigerator were consistent with immediate QBC in cats. Eight positive results from immediate QBC were in accordance with refrigerated results in dogs. There were ten positive results in the room-temperature sample with two false-positive results. Our study showed that storing conditions at room temperature or refrigeration for 24 h does not impact the results of QBC in cat urine samples. For dog samples, chilled samples have a higher accuracy rate than room temperature samples, although the overall agreement was still satisfactory.

Keywords: canine; feline; urinalysis; urinary tract infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Urine sample collection

Similar articles

References

    1. Acierno MJ, Partyka M, Waite K, da Cunha A, Mitchell MA. Effect of refrigeration of clinical canine urine samples on quantitative bacterial culture. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018 Jul 15;253(2):177-80. - PubMed
    1. Bailiff NL, Westropp JL, Nelson RW, Sykes JE, Owens SD, Kass PH. Evaluation of urine specific gravity and urine sediment as risk factors for urinary tract infections in cats. Vet Clin Pathol. 2008 Sep;37(3):317-22. - PubMed
    1. Burton EN, Cohn LA, Reinero CN, Rindt H, Moore SG, Ericsson AC. Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs. PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callens AJ, Bartges JW. Urinalysis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2015 Jul;45(4):621-37. - PubMed
    1. Coffey EL, Little K, Seelig DM, Rendahl AK, Granick JL. Comparison of immediate versus delayed streak plate inoculation on urine bacterial culture and susceptibility testing in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2020 Mar;34(2):783-9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources