Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15:332:119-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Isometric Hamming embeddings of weighted graphs

Affiliations

Isometric Hamming embeddings of weighted graphs

Joseph Berleant et al. Discrete Appl Math. .

Abstract

A mapping α:V(G)V(H) from the vertex set of one graph G to another graph H is an isometric embedding if the shortest path distance between any two vertices in G equals the distance between their images in H. Here, we consider isometric embeddings of a weighted graph G into unweighted Hamming graphs, called Hamming embeddings, when G satisfies the property that every edge is a shortest path between its endpoints. Using a Cartesian product decomposition of G called its canonical isometric representation, we show that every Hamming embedding of G may be partitioned into a canonical partition, whose parts provide Hamming embeddings for each factor of the canonical isometric representation of G. This implies that G permits a Hamming embedding if and only if each factor of its canonical isometric representation is Hamming embeddable. This result extends prior work on unweighted graphs that showed that an unweighted graph permits a Hamming embedding if and only if each factor is a complete graph. When a graph G has nontrivial isometric representation, determining whether G has a Hamming embedding can be simplified to checking embeddability of two or more smaller graphs.

Keywords: Graph embeddings; Graph factorization; Hamming graphs; Isometric embeddings; Metric spaces; Weighted graphs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Embedding weighted graphs is more difficult than unweighted graphs, and some guarantees for unweighted graphs no longer hold. (a) A simple graph which permits a Hamming embedding into K24×K32, but which is not covered by previous theorems on isometric embeddings of weighted graphs. (b) A weighted graph that permits a hypercube embedding, but for which the unweighted graph generated via edge subdivision is not. (c) A weighted graph, K4 with uniform edge weights of 2, for which multiple non-equivalent hypercube embeddings exist.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(a) Illustration of the Cartesian graph product. Edge colors indicate correspondence between edges in the factor and product graphs. If edges are weighted, two edges of the same color will have the same weight. (b) This graph product is isometrically embeddable in a product of three irreducible graphs (K3,K2, and K2), which form the factors of its canonical isometric representation. (c) A weighted graph, with purple edges of weight 4 and orange edges of weight 2. Edge colors also indicate equivalence classes under the transitive closure θˆ of the Djoković-Winkler relation (d) A hypercube embedding of this graph, with digits colored to indicate equivalence classes under γˆ.γˆ is the transitive closure of γ, which relates coordinates whose digits change together across some edge. (e) Our results show that the hypercube embedding in (d) may be partitioned into a hypercube embedding for each factor. The same is true of any Hamming embedding of a weight-minimal graph.

References

    1. Antebi YE, Linton JM, Klumpe H, Bintu B, Gong M, Su C, McCardell R, Elowitz MB, Combinatorial signal perception in the BMP pathway, Cell 170 (6) (2017) 1184–1196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avis D, Hypermetric spaces and the Hamming cone, Canad. J. Math. 33 (4) (1981) 795–802.
    1. Bandelt H-J, Retracts of hypercubes, J. Graph Theory 8 (4) (1984) 501–510.
    1. Bee C, Chen Y-J, Queen M, Ward D, Liu X, Organick L, Seelig G, Strauss K, Ceze L, Molecular-level similarity search brings computing to DNA data storage, Nature Commun. 12 (1) (2021) 4764. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björner A, Edelman PH, Ziegler GM, Hyperplane arrangements with a lattice of regions, Discrete Comput. Geom. 5 (3) (1990) 263–288.

LinkOut - more resources