Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;41(3):474-508.
doi: 10.1080/07362994.2022.2033126. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

REDACS: Regional emergency-driven adaptive cluster sampling for effective COVID-19 management

Affiliations

REDACS: Regional emergency-driven adaptive cluster sampling for effective COVID-19 management

M Stehlík et al. Stoch Anal Appl. 2023.

Abstract

As COVID-19 is spreading, national agencies need to monitor and track several metrics. Since we do not have perfect testing programs on the hand, one needs to develop an advanced sampling strategies for prevalence study, control and management. Here we introduce REDACS: Regional emergency-driven adaptive cluster sampling for effective COVID-19 management and control and justify its usage for COVID-19. We show its advantages over classical massive individual testing sampling plans. We also point out how regional and spatial heterogeneity underlines proper sampling. Fundamental importance of adaptive control parameters from emergency health stations and medical frontline is outlined. Since the Northern hemisphere entered Autumn and Winter season (this paper was originally submitted in November 2020), practical illustration from spatial heterogeneity of Chile (Southern hemisphere, which already experienced COVID-19 winter outbreak peak) is underlying the importance of proper regional heterogeneity of sampling plan. We explain the regional heterogeneity by microbiological backgrounds and link it to behavior of Lyapunov exponents. We also discuss screening by antigen tests from the perspective of "on the fly" biomarker validation, i.e., during the screening.

Keywords: ACS; REDACS; antigen test validation; prevalence; sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Idealized relationships between health outcome, biomarker status and treatment, for three different types of biomarkers. Plots show health outcome as a function of treatment (C = control, T = therapeutic) and biomarker status (solid line = negative, dashed line = positive). (A) A biomarker that is only prognostic. The biomarker is not predictive in the sense that treatment effect is the same regardless of biomarker status. (B) A biomarker that is only predictive as only one of the biomarker groups benefits from treatment. (C) A biomarker that is both prognostic and predictive; biomarker-positive patients have better outcomes than biomarker negative patients regardless of treatment group, and treatment effect is different depending on the biomarker level. Inspired by Figure 2 from [50].
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Active cases in Slovakia from 23.10.2020: Districts (Left), Regions (Right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Map of Chile and its 16 respective regions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Selected variables and their spatial relationship: Smoking percentage (a), Temperature (b), Primary, Secondary and Terciary workers (c, d and e, respectively), and Household income (f).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Lyapunov exponents for system (10) with μ=0.05, Δt=1, β=1.4, N=1000.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Active cases.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Daily new cases.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Lyapunov exponent vs. lag.

References

    1. Swaminathan A, Subramanian S (2020). Reflections on designing population surveys for COVID-19 infection and prevalence. GeroScience. 42(6):1445–1448. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-020-00253-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stehlík M, Kisel’ák J, Dinamarca MA, Li Y, Ying Y (2021). On COVID-19 outbreaks predictions: Issues on stability, parameter sensitivity, and precision. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 39(3):383–404. DOI: 10.1080/07362994.2020.1802291. - DOI
    1. Thompson SK (1990). Adaptive cluster sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85(412):1050–1059. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474975. - DOI
    1. Ujiie M, Tsuzuki S, Ohmagari N (2020). Effect of temperature on the infectivity of COVID-19. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 95:301–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gudbjartsson DF, Helgason A, Jonsson H, Magnusson OT, Melsted P, Norddahl GL, Saemundsdottir J, Sigurdsson A, Sulem P, Agustsdottir AB, et al. (2020). Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic Population. N Engl. J. Med. 382(24):2302–2315. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources