Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;26(2):101029.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101029. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Toward robust clinical genome interpretation: Developing a consistent terminology to characterize Mendelian disease-gene relationships-allelic requirement, inheritance modes, and disease mechanisms

Affiliations

Toward robust clinical genome interpretation: Developing a consistent terminology to characterize Mendelian disease-gene relationships-allelic requirement, inheritance modes, and disease mechanisms

Angharad M Roberts et al. Genet Med. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The terminology used for gene-disease curation and variant annotation to describe inheritance, allelic requirement, and both sequence and functional consequences of a variant is currently not standardized. There is considerable discrepancy in the literature and across clinical variant reporting in the derivation and application of terms. Here, we standardize the terminology for the characterization of disease-gene relationships to facilitate harmonized global curation and to support variant classification within the ACMG/AMP framework.

Methods: Terminology for inheritance, allelic requirement, and both structural and functional consequences of a variant used by Gene Curation Coalition members and partner organizations was collated and reviewed. Harmonized terminology with definitions and use examples was created, reviewed, and validated.

Results: We present a standardized terminology to describe gene-disease relationships, and to support variant annotation. We demonstrate application of the terminology for classification of variation in the ACMG SF 2.0 genes recommended for reporting of secondary findings. Consensus terms were agreed and formalized in both Sequence Ontology (SO) and Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) ontologies. Gene Curation Coalition member groups intend to use or map to these terms in their respective resources.

Conclusion: The terminology standardization presented here will improve harmonization, facilitate the pooling of curation datasets across international curation efforts and, in turn, improve consistency in variant classification and genetic test interpretation.

Keywords: Allelic requirement; Disease mechanisms; Gene curation; Inheritance modes; Ontology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest James S. Ware has received research support or consultancy fees from Myokardia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Foresite Labs. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Process for developing and testing the terminology.
HPO, human phenotype ontology; GenCC, The Gene Curation Coalition; SO, Sequence Ontology.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Matrix of 6 new high-level predicted functional consequences mapped to SO structural consequence terms via a semi-quantitative scale indicating likelihood of each high-level consequence. The semi-quantitative scale is characterized from first principles by expert evaluation.
NMD, nonsense-mediated-decay; UTR, untranslated regions; SO, Sequence Ontology.

Update of

References

    1. Chong JX, Buckingham KJ, Jhangiani SN, et al. The genetic basis of Mendelian phenotypes: discoveries, challenges, and opportunities. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(2):199–215.10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22(2):245–257. 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bean LJH, Funke B, Carlston CM, et al. Diagnostic gene sequencing panels: from design to report-a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2020;22(3):453–461. 10.1038/s41436-019-0666-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strande NT, Riggs ER, Buchanan AH, et al. Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the clinical genome resource. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(6):895–906. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types