Developing Evidence for Equitable Assessment Characteristics Based on Clinical Learner Preferences Using Discrete Choice Experiments
- PMID: 37983403
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005360
Developing Evidence for Equitable Assessment Characteristics Based on Clinical Learner Preferences Using Discrete Choice Experiments
Abstract
Purpose: Medical education is only beginning to explore the factors that contribute to equitable assessment in clinical settings. Increasing knowledge about equitable assessment ensures a quality medical education experience that produces an excellent, diverse physician workforce equipped to address the health care disparities facing patients and communities. Through the lens of the Anti-Deficit Achievement framework, the authors aimed to obtain evidence for a model for equitable assessment in clinical training.
Method: A discrete choice experiment approach was used which included an instrument with 6 attributes each at 2 levels to reveal learner preferences for the inclusion of each attribute in equitable assessment. Self-identified underrepresented in medicine (UIM) and not underrepresented in medicine (non-UIM) (N = 306) fourth-year medical students and senior residents in medicine, pediatrics, and surgery at 9 institutions across the United States completed the instrument. A mixed-effects logit model was used to determine attributes learners valued most.
Results: Participants valued the inclusion of all assessment attributes provided except for peer comparison. The most valued attribute of an equitable assessment was how learner identity, background, and trajectory were appreciated by clinical supervisors. The next most valued attributes were assessment of growth, supervisor bias training, narrative assessments, and assessment of learner's patient care, with participants willing to trade off any of the attributes to get several others. There were no significant differences in value placed on assessment attributes between UIM and non-UIM learners. Residents valued clinical supervisors valuing learner identity, background, and trajectory and clinical supervisor bias training more so than medical students.
Conclusions: This study offers support for the components of an antideficit-focused model for equity in assessment and informs efforts to promote UIM learner success and guide equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives in medical education.
Copyright © 2023 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Similar articles
-
A Narrative Study of Equity in Clinical Assessment Through the Antideficit Lens.Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments):S121-S130. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003690. Acad Med. 2020. PMID: 33229956
-
Inclusion and equity: Experiences of underrepresented in medicine physicians throughout the medical education continuum.Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2021 Oct;51(10):101089. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2021.101089. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2021. PMID: 34742660 Review.
-
Factors that Influence Underrepresented in Medicine (UIM) Medical Students to Pursue a Career in Academic Pediatrics.J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Feb;113(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 5. J Natl Med Assoc. 2021. PMID: 32771220
-
Upholding Our PROMISE: Underrepresented in Medicine Pediatric Residents' Perspectives on Interventions to Promote Belonging.Acad Med. 2023 Dec 1;98(12):1434-1442. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005443. Epub 2023 Aug 30. Acad Med. 2023. PMID: 37643583
-
Diversity and Inclusion: A Review of Effective Initiatives in Surgery.J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1500-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 18. J Surg Educ. 2021. PMID: 33879396
Cited by
-
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug;43(8):879-936. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y. Epub 2025 May 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40397369 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davis D, Dorsey JK, Franks RD, Sackett PR, Searcy CA, Zhao X. Do racial and ethnic group differences in performance on the MCAT exam reflect test bias? Acad Med. 2013;88:593–602.
-
- Campos-Outcalt D, Rutala PJ, Witzke DB, Fulginiti JV. Performances of underrepresented-minority students at the University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1987-1991. Acad Med. 1994;69:577–582.
-
- Low D, Pollack SW, Liao ZC, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:487–496.
-
- Bullock JL, Lockspeiser T, Del Pino-Jones A, Richards R, Teherani A, Hauer KE. They don’t see a lot of people my color: A mixed methods study of racial/ethnic stereotype threat among medical students on core clerkships. Acad Med. 2020;95(11 Suppl):S58–S66.
-
- Orom H, Semalulu T, Underwood W. The social and learning environments experienced by underrepresented minority medical students: A narrative review. Acad Med. 2013;88:1765–1777.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources