Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;43(4):349-362.
doi: 10.1177/07334648231214905. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

Advance Care Planning: A Story of Trust Within the Family

Lory A Iunius  1 , Sarah Vilpert  1   2 , Clément Meier  1   2 , Ralf J Jox  3   4 , Gian Domenico Borasio  3 , Jürgen Maurer  1
Affiliations

Advance Care Planning: A Story of Trust Within the Family

Lory A Iunius et al. J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

As the family usually plays a central role at the end of life, the quality of family relationships may influence how individuals approach advance care planning (ACP). Our study investigates the associations of trust in relatives with regard to end-of-life (EOL) issues-used as a proxy measure of family relationship quality-with individuals' engagement in EOL discussions, advance directive (AD) awareness, approval and completion, and designation of a healthcare proxy. Using nationally representative data of adults aged 55 years and over from wave 6 (2015) of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) in Switzerland (n = 1911), we show that complete trust in relatives is related to higher engagement in ACP. Subject to patient consent, the family should, therefore, be included in the ACP process, as such practice could enhance patient-centered EOL care and quality of life at the end of life.

Keywords: advance care planning; advance directives; family; population-based study; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Respondents’ approaches towards Advance Care Planning by level of trust in relatives, weighted percentage, and 95% confidence intervals, adults aged 55+, SHARE Switzerland, 2015.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Respondents’ interlocutors for Advance Care Planning, weighted percentages, and 95% confidence intervals, adults aged 55+, SHARE Switzerland, 2015 (Note. Respondents could choose more than one category).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Albert I., Trommsdorff G., Sabatier C. (2011). Patterns of relationship regulation: German and French adolescents’ perceptions with regard to their mothers. Family Science, 2(1), 58–67. 10.1080/19424620.2011.604573 - DOI
    1. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234. 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00084-6 - DOI
    1. Antonovsky A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Well-Being (pp. 12–37). Wiley.
    1. Aronson J. (1992). WOMEN’S sense of responsibility for the care of old people: “But who else is going to do it?”. Gender and Society, 6(1), 8–29. 10.1177/089124392006001002 - DOI
    1. Athanasopoulou P. (2009). Relationship quality: A critical literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 583–610. 10.1108/03090560910946945 - DOI

Publication types