Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;21(3):144-154.
doi: 10.3121/cmr.2023.1796.

Outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Gastric Coronary Vein Embolization for Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

Affiliations

Outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Gastric Coronary Vein Embolization for Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

Gauri Mukhiya et al. Clin Med Res. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with gastric coronary vein embolization (GCVE) for cirrhotic portal hypertensive variceal bleeding and compare outcomes of first-line with second-line treatment, coil with glue, and single-covered with double stents.Methods: Fifteen patients received TIPS plus GCVE as the first-line treatment for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and 45 received it as second-line treatment. Preoperative and postoperative quantitative variables were compared using a paired t test. The incidence of survival rate, re-bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and shunt dysfunction were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: The portal venous pressure was significantly decreased from 39.0 ± 5.0 mm Hg to 22.5 ± 4.4 mm Hg (P≤0.001) after TIPS treatment. After 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months re-bleeding rates were 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 13.3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Shunt dysfunction rates were 5%, 0%, 10%, 16.6%, 1.6%, and 5%, respectively. Hepatic encephalopathy rates were 3.3%, 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. And survival rates were 100%, 100%, 100%, 96.6%, 93.3%, and 88.3% respectively. In comparative analysis, statistically significant differences were seen in re-bleeding between the first-line and second-line treatment groups (26.6% vs 24.4%, log-rank P=0.012), and survival rates between single-covered and double stent (3.7% vs 16.1%, log-rang (P=0.043).Conclusion: The results suggest that TIPS combined with GCVE is effective and safer in the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertensive variceal bleeding. The use of TIP plus GCVE as first-line treatment, may be preferable for high-risk re-bleeding, and more than 25 mm Hg portal venous pressure with repeated variceal bleeding. However, the sample size was small. Therefore, large, randomized, controlled, multidisciplinary center studies are needed for further evaluation.

Keywords: Cirrhotic portal hypertension; Esophageal Variceal bleeding; Gastric Variceal bleeding; Gastric coronary vein embolization; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier Curve of re-bleeding; the cumulative rate of re-bleeding at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 13.3%, 0%, and 0%.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier curve of re-bleeding between first-line treatment and second-line treatment group (26.6% vs 24.4%, log-rank P= 0.012).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curve of shunt dysfunction; the cumulative rate of shunt dysfunction at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 5%, 0%, 10%, 16.6%, 1.6%, and 5%.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier curve of hepatic encephalopathy; the cumulative rate of hepatic encephalopathy at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 3.3%, 1.6%, 3.3%, 6.6%, 0%, and 0%.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Kaplan-Meier curve of survival rate; the cumulative survival rate at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 100%, 100%, 100%, 96.6%, 93.3%, and 88.3%.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Kaplan-Meier curve of survival rate between single covered stent group and double covered stent, (3.7% vs 16.1%, log-rang P=0.043).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rössle M. TIPS: 25years later. J Hepatol. 2013;59(5):1081-1093. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.06.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases . The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension: Update 2009. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):306. doi:10.1002/hep.23383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rossi P, Salvatori FM, Fanelli F, et al. . Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: 3-year experience. Radiology. 2004;231(3):820-830. doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030349 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charon JP, Alaeddin FH, Pimpalwar SA, et al. . Results of a retrospective multicenter trial of the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(11):1219-1230. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000137434.19522.E5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richter GM, Palmaz JC, Nöldge G, et al. . Der transjuguläre intrahepatische portosystemische Stent-Shunt (TIPSS). Eine neue nichtoperative, perkutane Methode [The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt. A new nonsurgical percutaneous method]. Radiologe. 1989;29(8):406-411. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources