Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;88(3):333-341.
doi: 10.1002/jdd.13422. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

Lessons learned from a non-traditional application process: Integrating user experiences to inform admission application design

Michael D Wolcott  1 , Jazmin Cromartie  1 , Daniel E Mason  2 , Jade S X Stewart  3 , Kimberly J Werth  1
Affiliations

Lessons learned from a non-traditional application process: Integrating user experiences to inform admission application design

Michael D Wolcott et al. J Dent Educ. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The research aim was to gather applicant expectations and perspectives with a user-centered approach during a pilot application process for a new dental school. The goal was to inform future admissions practices at our institution and for programs broadly.

Methods: The High Point University admission team developed an electronic application external to current centralized services that was launched from May to August 2022. Participants who completed the application were requested to complete an electronic survey of closed- and open-ended questions about the factors influencing their application decisions, feedback about how to optimize the experience, and their overall satisfaction using a Net Promoter Score.

Results: A total of 303 applicants (79% response rate) completed the survey about their application experience. The most influential reason for applying to the program was the optional Dental Admissions Test requirement (43%). Participants frequently referenced a need for a more human-centered process focused on the candidate rather than their numerical values and that the process should be smooth, straight-forward, short, easy, and simple. Participants requested that experiences should be weighed the most in the application process followed by letters of recommendation. Most applicants were "promoters" (68%) for the program with a Net Promoter Score of 62. Moreover, 32% and 45% rated the application process as the best or better application experience compared to other programs.

Conclusion: Programs can benefit from collecting applicant's (i.e., users) opinions and feedback about their expectations and experiences to inform more user-centered application processes.

Keywords: admission application; applicant perspective; pre-doctoral education; user centered design; user experience research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Dental Education Association Data, Analysis, and Research. Applicants, Enrollees, and Graduates Data. American Dental Education Association; Accessed July 01, 2023. https://www.adea.org/publications-and-data/data-analysis-and-research/ap...
    1. Aalboe JA, Harper C, Beeman CS, Paaso BA. Dental school application timing: implications for full admission consideration and improving diversity of dental students. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(4):575-579.
    1. Duff RE, Katcher PA, Daniels RM, Ramaswamy V. The multiple mini interview as a dental school admission tool: can it predict noncognitive traits associated with professional behaviors? J Dent Educ. 2020;84(4):478-485.
    1. Rowland KC, Rieken S. Rethinking dental school admissions criteria: correlation between pre-admission variables and first-year performance for six classes at one dental school. J Dent Educ. 2018;82(4):411-416.
    1. Chaviano-Moran R, Chuck E, Perez H. Unintended demographic bias in GPA/DAT-based pre-admission screening: an argument for holistic admission in dental school. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(11):1280-1288.

LinkOut - more resources