Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
- PMID: 37988338
- PMCID: PMC10662708
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294721
Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
Abstract
Background: Understanding what promotes or hinders a community's capacity to serve the priorities of its residents is essential for the alignment of citizen needs and governance. Participatory approaches that engage community residents on the topic of community wellbeing are useful methods for defining outcomes that reflect a community's goals and priorities. Using qualitative focus group methods, the aim of this study was to outline bottom-up definitions of community wellbeing from a diverse pool of community residents in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: Semi-structured, two-hour group interviews were conducted with adult (≥18 years) participants (N = 15) residing in four communities across Canada's largest province of Ontario. Participants were purposively selected from a pool of screening questionnaires to ensure diverse group compositions based on race, gender, age, and educational attainment. Interviews were thematically analysed using descriptive and interpretive methods to characterize resident conceptions of community wellbeing.
Results: Focus group participants were between 18 and 75 years of age and most had lived in their local community for 5 or more years. Four major themes emerged: (1) a sense of community belonging is cultivated through shared spaces, routines, support, and identities; (2) a community constitutes the amenities and social contexts that enable residents to thrive; (3) effective regional decision-making must be community-informed; and (4) the wellbeing of a community relies on equal opportunities for engagement and participation.
Conclusions: Residents described their communities and their associated wellbeing as a combination of accessible amenities and opportunities to engage without marginalization. This study underscores the value of participatory approaches in community wellbeing research, where the viewpoint and life experience of residents is used to inform local decision-making and service delivery. Future research will capture more diverse perspectives towards community belonging, particularly from community newcomers, for the development of regionally appropriate indicators of community wellbeing.
Copyright: © 2023 Michalski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Cox D, Frere M, West S, Wiseman J. Developing and using local community wellbeing indicators: Learning from the experience of Community Indicators Victoria. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 2010;45: 71–88. doi: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2010.tb00164.x - DOI
-
- Sung H, Phillips RG. Indicators and community well-being: exploring a relational framework. Int Journal of Com WB. 2018;1: 63–79. doi: 10.1007/s42413-018-0006-0 - DOI
-
- Christakopoulou S, Dawson J, Gari A. The community well-being questionnaire: theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity. Social Indicators Research. 2001;56: 319–349. doi: 10.1023/A:1012478207457 - DOI
-
- Kim Y, Ludwigs K. Measuring community well-being and individual well-being for public policy: the case of the community well-being atlas. In: Phillips R, Wong C, editors. Handbook of Community Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2017. pp. 423–433. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_22 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
