Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3760-3769.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000940.

Preferred Reporting Of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) 2023 guidelines

Ginimol Mathew  1 , Catrin Sohrabi  1 , Thomas Franchi  2 , Maria Nicola  3 , Ahmed Kerwan  4 , Riaz Agha  5 ; PROCESS Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Preferred Reporting Of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) 2023 guidelines

Ginimol Mathew et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines were developed in 2016 in order to improve the reporting quality of surgical case series. Since its inception, it has been updated twice, in 2018 and 2020, and has been cited over 1000 times. PROCESS guidelines have enjoyed great acceptance within the surgical research community. Our aim is to update the PROCESS guidelines in order to maintain its applicability in the field of surgical research.

Methods: A PROCESS 2023 steering group was created. By working in collaboration, members of this group came up with proposals to update the PROCESS 2020 guidelines. These proposals were presented to an expert panel of researchers, who in turn scrutinised these proposals and decided whether they should become part of PROCESS 2023 guidelines or not, through a Delphi consensus exercise.

Results: A total of 38 people participated in the development of PROCESS 2023 guidelines. The majority of items received a score between 7 and 9 from greater than 70% of the participants, indicating consensus with the proposed changes to those items. However, two items (3c and 6a) received a score between 7 and 9 from less than 70% of the participants, indicating a lack of consensus with the proposed changes to those items. Those items will remain unchanged.

Discussion: The updated PROCESS 2023 guidelines are presented with an aim to continue improving the reporting quality of case series in surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial, consultative, institutional, or other relationships that might lead to bias or conflict of interest.

References

    1. Torres-Duque CA, Patino CM, Ferreira JC. Case series: an essential study design to build knowledge and pose hypotheses for rare and new diseases. J Bras Pneumol 2020;46:e20200389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coroneos CJ, Chin BH. Evaluating case series in surgery Thoma A, Sprague S, Voineskos S, Goldsmith C. Evidence-based surgery. Springer; 2019:183–191.
    1. Vandenbroucke JP. In defense of case reports and case series. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:330–334. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Lee SY, et al. Systematic review of the methodological and reporting quality of case series in surgery. Br J Surg 2016;103:1253–1258. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, et al. PROCESS Group. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg 2016;36(Pt A):319–323. - PubMed