Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- PMID: 37988448
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015800
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) among patients with stable chest pain has been studied in several trials with conflicting results.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CCTA first versus direct ICA among patients with stable chest pain, who were initially referred to ICA. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the 2 strategies. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% CIs were computed for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.
Results: Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 5727 patients were included, of whom 51.1% were referred to CCTA and 22.5% of patients had evidence of ischemia on a prior functional test. In the follow-up ranging from 1 to 3.5 years, 660 of the 2928 patients randomized to CCTA first underwent ICA (23%). Patients who underwent CCTA had lower rates of coronary revascularization (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.84]; P<0.001) and stroke (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.26-0.98]; P=0.043). Cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.24-1.23]; P=0.146), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.64-1.10]; P=0.198), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.63-1.88]; P=0.768), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.59-1.39]; P=0.669) did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusions: In patients with stable chest pain referred for ICA, CCTA avoided the need for ICA in 77% of patients otherwise referred for ICA. CCTA was associated with a reduction in the rates of coronary revascularization and stroke compared with direct ICA.
Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023383143.
Keywords: chest pain; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; meta-analysis; myocardial ischemia.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of stable angina by coronary computed tomographic angiography versus standard of care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Feb;59:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Jul 27. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024. PMID: 37541837
-
Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Feb 26;61(8):880-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.061. Epub 2013 Feb 6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23395069
-
Meta-analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care strategy for the evaluation of low risk chest pain: are randomized controlled trials and cohort studies showing the same evidence?Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Int J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25499386 Review.
-
Acute chest pain evaluation using coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.Heart. 2018 Feb;104(3):215-221. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311647. Epub 2017 Aug 30. Heart. 2018. PMID: 28855273
-
Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1129-1138. doi: 10.1002/clc.22799. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Clin Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28914973 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Promising Pathway Toward Mitigation and Eradication of Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiol Res. 2024 Dec;15(6):415-424. doi: 10.14740/cr1721. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Cardiol Res. 2024. PMID: 39698012 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Clinical application of cardiac computed tomography : Current recommendations].Herz. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00059-025-05310-4. Online ahead of print. Herz. 2025. PMID: 40133515 Review. German.
-
Impactful Cardiac CT and MRI Articles from 2023.Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Oct;6(5):e240142. doi: 10.1148/ryct.240142. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39446045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Concordance between Coronary Artery Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography in a Real-World Population with Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):1905. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171905. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39272690 Free PMC article.
-
Evolving Role of Coronary CT Angiography in Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A State-of-the-Art Review.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1347-1357. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02144-0. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39412596 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous