Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20323.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45815-8.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Affiliations

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Jia-Shiuan Ju et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CS-K received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilliy, Novartis, OnO Pharma, Chugai, Merck, Janssen Pharma, Takeda and Guardant Health. CS-K provided consultation for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilliy, Merck, Chugai, Takeda, Novartis and Guardant Health. None of the other authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PFS between patients grouped by (A) with or without BM (B) with or without BM and first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. BM brain metastasis, 1G first-generation EGFR-TKI, 2G second-generation EGFR-TKI.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of systemic progression without death (black) and CNS- alone progression without death (red) between first-generation EGFR-TKI gefitinib/erlotinib (solid line) and second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib (broken line) in patients (A) with brain metastasis and (B) without brain metastasis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The OS between patients grouped by (A) with or without BM (B) with or without BM and EGFR mutation subtype. BM brain metastasis, 19del EGFR 19 deletion mutation, L858R EGFR L858R mutation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The secondary T790M rate between patients grouped by (A) with or without BM and PFS ≥ or < 12 months (B) with or without BM, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI treatment. BM brain metastasis, 19del EGFR 19 deletion mutation, L858R EGFR L858R mutation, 1G first-generation EGFR-TKI, 2G second-generation EGFR-TKI.

References

    1. Hsu WH, et al. Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29(suppl_1):i3–i9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx702. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsubata Y, Tanino R, Isobe T. Current therapeutic strategies and prospects for EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer based on the mechanisms underlying drug resistance. Cells. 2021;10(11):3192. doi: 10.3390/cells10113192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qin K, et al. Prognostic value of TP53 concurrent mutations for EGFR- TKIs and ALK-TKIs based targeted therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06805-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan SWS, et al. Systemic inflammatory markers of survival in epidermal growth factor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: Single-institution analysis, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Clin. Lung Cancer. 2021;22(5):390–407. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ge M, et al. High probability and frequency of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases. J. Neurooncol. 2017;135(2):413–418. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2590-x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms