Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20327.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47670-z.

Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Ricarda Merfort et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure for patients suffering from hip pain e.g. from osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or hip fractures. The satisfaction of patients undergoing THA is influenced by the choice of implant type and material, with one key factor being the selection of the appropriate material combination for the bearing surface. In this Bayesian network meta-analysis, we investigated the impact of material combinations for the bearing surface on the longevity of hip implants. The wear penetration rate per year and the total wear penetration in the liner resulting from different material combinations, as well as the survival rate at last follow-up, were examined. We analyzed a total of 663,038 THAs, with 55% of patients being women. Mean patient age was 59.0 ± 8.1 years and mean BMI 27.6 ± 2.6 kg/m2. The combination of an aluminium oxide (Al2O3) head and an Al2O3 liner demonstrated the lowest wear penetration at last follow-up and the lowest rate of wear penetration per year. Additionally, the combination of a crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) liner and a zircon oxide (ZrO2) head demonstrated the lowest rate of revision at last follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of careful material selection for hip implant bearing surfaces to optimize their longevity and patient satisfaction after THA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of the literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Figure 3
Figure 3
From left to the right: edge, funnel and interval plots of the comparison: overall wear penetration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
From left to the right: edge, funnel and interval plots of the comparison: wear penetration per year.
Figure 5
Figure 5
From left to the right: edge, funnel and interval plots of the comparison: rate of revision at last follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howick, J. C. I., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., Moschetti, I., Phillips, B., Thornton, H., Goddard, O. & Hodgkinson, M. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011). Available at https://www.cebmnet/indexaspx?o=5653 .
    1. Evans JT, Evans JP, Walker RW, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Sayers A. How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019;393:647–654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okafor L, Chen AF. Patient satisfaction and total hip arthroplasty: A review. Arthroplasty. 2019;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s42836-019-0007-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Z, Hou J-Z, Wu C-H, Zhou Y-J, Gu X-M, Wang H-H, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018;13:229. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0929-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samy AM, Mahmoud AA, El-Tantawy A. Dual mobility cup: Does it improve patient's satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty? A prospective comparative randomized study. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2021;29:e1141–e1150. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00882. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types