Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 22;8(1):70.
doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00524-8.

To see or not to see: the parallel processing of self-relevance and facial expressions

Affiliations

To see or not to see: the parallel processing of self-relevance and facial expressions

Tuo Liu et al. Cogn Res Princ Implic. .

Abstract

The self, like the concept of central "gravity", facilitates the processing of information that is directly relevant to the self. This phenomenon is known as the self-prioritization effect. However, it remains unclear whether the self-prioritization effect extends to the processing of emotional facial expressions. To fill this gap, we used a self-association paradigm to investigate the impact of self-relevance on the recognition of emotional facial expressions while controlling for confounding factors such as familiarity and overlearning. Using a large and diverse sample, we replicated the effect of self-relevance on face processing but found no evidence for a modulation of self-relevance on facial emotion recognition. We propose two potential theoretical explanations to account for these findings and emphasize that further research with different experimental designs and a multitasks measurement approach is needed to understand this mechanism fully. Overall, our study contributes to the literature on the parallel cognitive processing of self-relevance and facial emotion recognition, with implications for both social and cognitive psychology.

Keywords: Facial emotion; Self-concept; Self-relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Procedure of the whole experiment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Stimuli examples used in the facial emotion recognition task
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The results of the perceptual matching task. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The results of the facial emotion recognition task. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals

References

    1. An S, Ji L-J, Marks M, Zhang Z. Two sides of emotion: Exploring positivity and negativity in six basic emotions across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00610. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anwyl-Irvine AL, Massonnié J, Flitton A, Kirkham N, Evershed JK. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods. 2020;52(1):388–407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armitage J, Eerola T. Reaction time data in music cognition: comparison of pilot data from lab, crowdsourced, and convenience web samples. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02883. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59(4):390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005. - DOI
    1. Bargh JA. Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;43:425–436. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.425. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources