Comparative Treatment Persistence and Adherence to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Japan: A Real-World Administrative Claims Database Study
- PMID: 37991630
- PMCID: PMC10721767
- DOI: 10.1007/s41030-023-00244-w
Comparative Treatment Persistence and Adherence to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Japan: A Real-World Administrative Claims Database Study
Abstract
Introduction: Real-world data on the comparative effectiveness of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs; macitentan, bosentan, ambrisentan) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), particularly in Asian countries, are scarce. We evaluated the persistence of these ERAs before and after macitentan approval in Japan (2015).
Methods: We used real-world data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision administrative claims database between April 2008 and November 2020. Patients with PAH were identified from the dataset. Persistence to ERA treatment before and after approval of macitentan in Japan was defined as the time between start of the index ERA and treatment discontinuation or death. Propensity score adjustment was applied to minimize confounding effects among treatment groups.
Results: In the pre-macitentan approval cohort, 153 and 51 patients received bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively. In the post-macitentan approval cohort, 331, 284, and 91 patients received macitentan, bosentan, and ambrisentan, respectively. Unadjusted median persistence for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients was 19 and 10 months, respectively (adjusted HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.61-1.24]; P = 0.434 [bosentan as reference]). In the post-macitentan approval cohort, unadjusted median persistence was 18 months for macitentan-treated patients versus 6 and 8 months for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients, respectively. Adjusted HRs for ambrisentan and bosentan were 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.95; P = 0.006) and 1.63 (95% CI 1.30-2.04; P < 0.001 [macitentan as reference]), respectively.
Conclusions: Real-world data for Japanese patients with PAH showed that persistence was significantly higher for macitentan, versus ambrisentan and bosentan, since its approval.
Keywords: Endothelin receptor antagonists; Japanese patients; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Real-world data; Treatment persistence.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Junichi Omura is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Yogeshwar Makanji is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Nobuhiro Tanabe has nothing to disclose. Dae Young Yu is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Jin Yu Tan is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Sooyeol Lim is a former employee of Prospection, which received funding from Janssen to conduct the study analyses. Mahsa H. Kouhkamari is a former employee of Prospection, which received funding from Janssen to conduct the study analyses. Jeremy Casorso is a current employee of Prospection, which received funding from Janssen to conduct the study analyses. David Bin-Chia Wu is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Paul Bloomfield was an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals at the time of the analysis.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study.J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):596-604. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2328483. Epub 2024 Apr 10. J Med Econ. 2024. PMID: 38488130
-
A real-world comparative effectiveness analysis of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan on hospitalizations and healthcare resource utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Respir Med. 2025 Jul;243:108112. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108112. Epub 2025 Apr 22. Respir Med. 2025. PMID: 40273999
-
Slow receptor dissociation kinetics differentiate macitentan from other endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells.PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047662. Epub 2012 Oct 15. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23077657 Free PMC article.
-
A Focus on Macitentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Aug;123(2):103-113. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13033. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 29719121 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 7;9:977110. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.977110. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36568539 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Management of pulmonary hypertension in special conditions.Eur Respir J. 2024 Oct 31;64(4):2401180. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01180-2024. Print 2024 Oct. Eur Respir J. 2024. PMID: 39209477 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous