Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 22;31(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00518-9.

The effect of clinical guidelines on the utilisation of radiographs in chiropractic clinics in Denmark - an interrupted time series analysis

Affiliations

The effect of clinical guidelines on the utilisation of radiographs in chiropractic clinics in Denmark - an interrupted time series analysis

Pernille Schaldemose Reibke et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

Background: In Denmark, chiropractors have a statutory right to use radiography and the government-funded national Health Insurance provides partial reimbursement. Danish National Clinical Guidelines recommends against routine use of imaging for uncomplicated spinal pain; however, it is not clear if clinical imaging guidelines recommendations have had an effect on the utilisation of spinal radiography. This study aimed to describe the utilisation rate of radiographs in Danish chiropractic clinics in the period from 2010 to 2020 and to assess the impact of clinical guidelines and policy changes on the utilisation of radiographs in Danish chiropractic clinics.

Methods: Anonymised data from January 1st, 2010, to December 31st, 2020, were extracted from the Danish Regions register on health contacts in primary care. Data consisted of the total number of patients consulting one of 254 chiropractic clinics and the total number of patients having or being referred for radiography. Data were used to investigate the radiography utilisation per month from 2010 to 2020. An 'interrupted time series' analysis was conducted to determine if two interventions, the dissemination of 1) Danish clinical imaging guidelines recommendations and policy changes related to referral for advanced imaging for chiropractors in 2013 and 2) four Danish clinical guidelines recommendations in 2016, were associated with an immediate change in the level and/or slope of radiography utilisation.

Results: In total, 336,128 unique patients consulted a chiropractor in 2010 of which 55,449 (15.4%) had radiography. In 2020, the number of patients consulting a chiropractor had increased to 366,732 of which 29,244 (8.0%) had radiography. The pre-intervention utilisation decreased by two radiographs per 10,000 patients per month. Little absolute change, but still statistically significant for Intervention 1, in the utilisation was found after the dissemination of the clinical guidelines and policy changes in 2013 or 2016.

Conclusions: The proportion of Danish chiropractic patients undergoing radiography was halved in the period from 2010 to 2020. However, the dissemination of clinical imaging guidelines recommendations and policy changes related to referrals for advanced imaging showed little meaningful change in the monthly utilisation of radiographs in the same period.

Keywords: Chiropractor; Clinical guidelines; Radiography utilisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TSJ’s salary was partly financed by grants from the Foundation for Advancement of Chiropractic Research and Postgraduate Education in the study period. RKJ is partly employed at the chiropractic Knowledge Hub which is financed by the Foundation for Advancement of Chiropractic Research and Postgraduate Education. SDF is co-Editor-in-Chief of Chiropractic and Manual Therapies; the editorial management system blinded him from the manuscript and he had no part in the editorial or peer-review process of this manuscript. AB declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution by age groups of patients having radiography in 2010 and 2020 in Danish chiropractic clinics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Utilisation rate of radiographs in Danish chiropractic practice from 2010 to 2020
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Monthly data from 2010 to 2020 on the proportion of chiropractic patients having diagnostic imaging Note: Vertical red lines mark the interventions in January 2014 and December 2016. The x-axis is in months with ‘2010Jan’ representing January 2010 etc. The y-axis presents the proportion (0–1) of patients who received radiographs per month and is reduced to 0-0.1 for clarity

Similar articles

References

    1. Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Moore CS, French SD. Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review. Chiropr Man Ther. 2018;26:48. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0217-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Maher CG, Moloney NA, Magnussen JS, Hancock MJ. Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(12):2266–77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fine B, Schultz SE, White L, Henry D. Impact of restricting diagnostic imaging reimbursement for uncomplicated low back pain in Ontario: a population-based interrupted time series analysis. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(4):E760–E7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi DJ, Parker L, Zoga AM, Levin DC. National Trends in the utilization of skeletal radiography from 2003 to 2015. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(10):1408–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.007. - DOI - PubMed