How to engage patients in computerized cognitive training: a cognitive rehabilitation expert's perspective
- PMID: 37994038
- DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2284879
How to engage patients in computerized cognitive training: a cognitive rehabilitation expert's perspective
Abstract
Purpose: The relationship between a patient and their therapist plays a crucial role in patient engagement. While Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) may assist in preserving cognitive skills in cases of aging, dementia or acquired brain injuries, its effectiveness has not been definitively proven. Improving user engagement, acceptance, and software usability could aid in addressing this issue. The present study aims to identify potential obstacles and facilitators by examining the perspectives of rehabilitation professionals on the current usage of CCT software.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 rehabilitation professionals, familiar with a CCT software. The data were transcribed and followed by an independent iterative thematic analysis.
Results: Two major themes were identified: (1) facilitating factors and (2) difficulties related to use. The main obstacles were difficulties related to the computerized nature of the exercises, technology use, understanding the software and general learning difficulties. The main facilitators were the ecological and novel nature of the exercises, and the adaptability of the difficulty levels.
Conclusion: The complexity of the CCT presents challenges for its usage by rehabilitation professionals, which in turn can impede patient utilization as well. To address this issue and promote sustainable use of the software, providing instruction delivery to facilitate learning and understanding of the CCT is essential. Additionally, creating a standardized foundation that therapists can refer to for guidance may also aid in optimizing the software's usage. It is recommended to utilize a model for CCT acceptability and acceptance in developing these solutions to enhance patient engagement.
Keywords: Computerized cognitive training; acceptability; engagement; neurocognitive disorders; usability.
Plain language summary
Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) may help sustain cognitive skills or delay its decline due to causes such as aging, dementia or acquired brain injuries.User engagement, user acceptance and software usability could help address these issues.The relationship between a patient and their therapist plays a crucial role in patient engagement.Difficulties related to using and understanding a CCT software could affect behavioral intention/use.Rehabilitation professionals may face difficulties using CCT software, which could in turn, hinder patient utilization.Facilitating learning and understanding of the software through instruction delivery to increase acceptance could respond to the existing obstacles.A model for CCT acceptability/acceptance may be useful for improving the development of these solutions, to optimize patient engagement.Creating a standardized foundation for therapists to refer to could help optimize usage of CCT software.
Similar articles
-
Engagement in computerized cognitive training instructions by older people. A within-subject design to evaluate comprehension and acceptability of serious games instructions.Front Aging. 2025 Feb 3;6:1297704. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1297704. eCollection 2025. Front Aging. 2025. PMID: 39963688 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives of persons with mild cognitive impairment, caregivers and healthcare professionals on computer-assisted cognitive training: A multi-perspective qualitative study.Geriatr Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;61:560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 2. Geriatr Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39752976
-
Exploring the General Acceptability and User Experience of a Digital Therapeutic for Cognitive Training in a Singaporean Older Adult Population: Qualitative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 13;9:e63568. doi: 10.2196/63568. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 39805580 Free PMC article.
-
Effective engagement in computerized cognitive training for older adults.Ageing Res Rev. 2025 Feb;104:102650. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102650. Epub 2025 Jan 2. Ageing Res Rev. 2025. PMID: 39755175 Review.
-
[Efficiency of computerized cognitive training for prevention of cognitive impairments and stimulation of neuroplasticity.].Adv Gerontol. 2024;37(3):221-229. Adv Gerontol. 2024. PMID: 39139113 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Engagement in computerized cognitive training instructions by older people. A within-subject design to evaluate comprehension and acceptability of serious games instructions.Front Aging. 2025 Feb 3;6:1297704. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1297704. eCollection 2025. Front Aging. 2025. PMID: 39963688 Free PMC article.
-
How do you target cognitive training? Bridging the gap between standard and technological rehabilitation of cognitive domains.Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;15:1497642. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497642. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39575336 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Exploring the Discontinuous Usage Behavior of Digital Cognitive Training Among Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Family Members: Qualitative Study Using the Extended Model of IT Continuance.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 25;27:e66393. doi: 10.2196/66393. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40132189 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients With Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 12;27:e73140. doi: 10.2196/73140. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40503808 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources