Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2284471.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2284471. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

Factors associated with the decision to receive bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccination among health care personnel

Affiliations

Factors associated with the decision to receive bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccination among health care personnel

Nicholas M Mohr et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 complications, but uptake has been low. Our objective in this study was to compare the importance of factors reported to influence the decision to receive a bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine among health care personnel (HCP) tested for SARS-CoV-2 between October 2022 and April 2023 in a 20-hospital vaccine effectiveness study in the United States (n = 1656). Compared with those who had not received the booster, the factors most likely to be reported to be important were concerns about contracting COVID-19 (84.0% of those who had received the bivalent booster vs. 47.5% of those who had not, difference 36.6% points (PP), 95% confidence interval [CI] 32.1 to 41.1%), spreading infection to family members (89.2% vs. 62.8%, difference 26.3 PP, 95% CI 22.3 to 30.4%), and spreading infection to colleagues at work (85.5% vs. 59.4%, difference 26.1 PP, 95% CI 21.7 to 30.5%). HCP who had received the booster more frequently cited the primary literature (61.7% vs. 31.8%, difference 29.9 PP, 95% CI 24.6 to 35.2%) and employer recommendations (48.3% vs. 29.8%, difference 18.5 PP, 95% CI 13.2 to 23.9%) as influencing their decision. This analysis provides insight into factors for targeting future vaccine messaging.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccines; health personnel; occupational health; public health; vaccination hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Responses to questions about how factors influenced vaccination decisions, stratified by whether participants had received the COVID-19 bivalent booster, project PREVENT, October 2022–April 2023. Each bar displays the proportion of responses in each likert category. All bars are indexed to “moderately agree” (e.g., that is where the vertical line is on the graph), so the total length of the bar denotes 100% of responses. The panel on the left shows responses from those who had not received the bivalent booster, while the panel on the right shows responses from those who had received the bivalent booster.

References

    1. Watson OJ, Barnsley G, Toor J, Hogan AB, Winskill P, Ghani AC.. Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(9):1293–4. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byambasuren O, Stehlik P, Clark J, Alcorn K, Glasziou P. Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on long Covid: systematic review. BMJ Med. 2023;2(1):e000385. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milman O, Yelin I, Aharony N, Katz R, Herzel E, Ben-Tov A, Kuint J, Gazit S, Chodick G, Patalon T, et al. Community-level evidence for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection of unvaccinated individuals. Nat Med. 2021;27(8):1367–9. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01407-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobrovitz N, Ware H, Ma X, Li Z, Hosseini R, Cao C, Selemon A, Whelan M, Premji Z, Issa H, et al. Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(5):556–67. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00801-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Araos R, Goldberg Y, Groome MJ, Huppert A, O’Brien KL, Smith PG, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):924–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types