Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 16;38(Supplement_2):ii62-ii71.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad048.

The nature, drivers and equity consequences of informal payments for maternal and child health care in primary health centres in Enugu, Nigeria

Affiliations

The nature, drivers and equity consequences of informal payments for maternal and child health care in primary health centres in Enugu, Nigeria

Pamela Adaobi Ogbozor et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In Nigeria, most basic maternal and child health services in public primary health-care facilities should be either free of charge or subsidized. In practice, additional informal payments made in cash or in kind are common. We examined the nature, drivers and equity consequences of informal payments in primary health centres (PHC) in Enugu State. We used three interlinked qualitative methods: participant observation in six PHC facilities and two local government area (LGA) headquarters; in-depth interviews with frontline health workers (n = 19), managers (n = 4) and policy makers (n = 10); and focus group discussions (n = 2) with female service users. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo 12. Across all groups, informal payments were described as routine for immunization, deliveries, family planning consultations and birth certificate registration. Health workers, managers and policy makers identified limited supervision, insufficient financing of facilities, and lack of receipts for formal payments as enabling this practice. Informal payments were seen by managers and health workers as a mechanism to generate discretionary revenue to cover operational costs of the facility but, in practice, were frequently taken as extra income by health workers. Health workers rationalized informal payments as being of small value, and not a burden to users. However, informal payments were reported to be inequitable and exclusionary. Although they tended to be lower in rural PHCs than in wealthier urban facilities, participant observation revealed how, within a PHC, the lowest earners paid the same as others and were often left unattended if they failed to pay. Some female patients reported that extra payments excluded them from services, driving them to seek help from retail outlets or unlicensed health providers. As a result, informal payments reduced equity of access to essential services. Targeted policies are needed to improve financial risk protection for the poorest groups and address drivers of informal payments and unfairness in the health system.

Keywords: Informal payments; equity; maternal and child health; primary health care; user fees.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declared no conflicting interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdulraheem IS. 2012. Primary health care services in Nigeria: critical issues and strategies for enhancing the use by the rural communities. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology 4: 1.
    1. Adeyemo DO. 2005. Local government autonomy in Nigeria: a historical perspective. Journal of Social Sciences 10: 77–87.
    1. Afsana K. 2004. The tremendous cost of seeking hospital obstetric care in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters 12: 171–80. - PubMed
    1. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D et al. 2016. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet 387: 62–474. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anguera MT, Blanco-Villaseñor AB, Losada JS et al. 2018. Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: is it all in the name? Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 52: 2757–70.