Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 23;15(1):158.
doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00772-7.

Effect of adding hip exercises to general rehabilitation treatment of knee osteoarthritis on patients' physical functions: a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations

Effect of adding hip exercises to general rehabilitation treatment of knee osteoarthritis on patients' physical functions: a randomized clinical trial

Jie Qiu et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Hip adductor and abductor strength were both reduced in KOA patients. But to date, most of the researches have only focused on quadriceps combined with hip abductor strengthening versus quadriceps strengthening.

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of adding hip abductor and adductor strengthening to quadriceps strengthening on lower limb strength, knee pain and physical function in patients with medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: In this study, 42 participants, were randomly divided into two groups: the general treatment group (GT group) and the added-hip-exercise group (AH group). All participants were given a general rehabilitation treatment. The AH group performed hip abductor and adductor strengthening in addition to the general rehabilitation treatment. Knee and hip muscle strength, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. A two-sided 2-sample unpaired t test was performed to compare the difference in mean change scores between AH and GT groups.

Results: Finally, 36 participants completed the study: both groups consist of 18 participants. In the per-protocol analysis, the AH group had a greater improvement in knee extension strength (mean changes, 7.84 versus 36.48; P < 0.001) and hip abduction strength (mean changes, 5.05 versus 26.62; P = 0.001) than the control group. Similarly, the AH group had a greater improvement in the FTSST time (mean changes, 0.40 s versus 3.57 s; P < 0.001) and the TUFT time (mean changes, 0.18 s versus 1.67 s; P = 0.002) than the GH group. No statistical difference was found in the change of WOMAC pain scores and NRS between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Older adults with knee OA in the AH group had superior muscle strength, symptoms and daily activity performance at the 6th week than those in the GT group. And adding hip exercises could expedite improvement of pain at the 2th week, but not at the 6th week.

Trial registration: Clinical trial registration numbers and date of registration: ChiCTR-IOR-16009124, Registered 30 August 2016.

Keywords: Five times Sit-to-Stand Test; Hip exercises; Isometric muscle strengthening; Knee; Numerical Rating Scale; Osteoarthritis; Rehabilitation; The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities; Timed Up and Go Test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Testing and training position for hip exercises and quadriceps strengthening. A Hip muscle training and measurement were completed in the sitting position with the self-developed hip muscle testing and training device tied at 2 cm proximal to the knee joint. Participants performed isometric hip strength training by accomplishing hip abduction and adduction movements. The maximum hip adduction MVIC was displayed on the device screen when participants were squeezing the device by their legs on the inside. Similarly, the maximum hip abduction MVIC was displayed on the device screen when participants were pulling the device by their legs on the outside. B Participants completed quadriceps strengthening by taking the sitting position. During exercises, the testing device was fixed above the ankle joint. The maximum knee extensor strength was displayed on the device screen when participants extended their legs forward. The maximum knee flexor strength was displayed on the device screen when participants squeezed the machine backward
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram

References

    1. Hunter DJ, March L, Chew M. Osteoarthritis in 2020 and beyond: a Lancet Commission. The Lancet. 2020;396(10264):1711–1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32230-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745–1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Smith E, et al. Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990–2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):819–828. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arden NK, Perry TA, Bannuru RR, et al. Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):59–66. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00523-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall MC, Mockett SP, Doherty M. Relative impact of radiographic osteoarthritis and pain on quadriceps strength, proprioception, static postural sway and lower limb function. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(7):865–870. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.043653. - DOI - PMC - PubMed