ISE/ISHNE expert consensus statement on the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: The change of the paradigm
- PMID: 37997698
- PMCID: PMC10770819
- DOI: 10.1111/anec.13097
ISE/ISHNE expert consensus statement on the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: The change of the paradigm
Abstract
The ECG diagnosis of LVH is predominantly based on the QRS voltage criteria. The classical paradigm postulates that the increased left ventricular mass generates a stronger electrical field, increasing the leftward and posterior QRS forces, reflected in the augmented QRS amplitude. However, the low sensitivity of voltage criteria has been repeatedly documented. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and proposal of a new paradigm. The theoretical background for voltage measured at the body surface is defined by the solid angle theorem, which relates the measured voltage to spatial and non-spatial determinants. The spatial determinants are represented by the extent of the activation front and the distance of the recording electrodes. The non-spatial determinants comprise electrical characteristics of the myocardium, which are comparatively neglected in the interpretation of the QRS patterns. Various clinical conditions are associated with LVH. These conditions produce considerable diversity of electrical properties alterations thereby modifying the resultant QRS patterns. The spectrum of QRS patterns observed in LVH patients is quite broad, including also left axis deviation, left anterior fascicular block, incomplete and complete left bundle branch blocks, Q waves, and fragmented QRS. Importantly, the QRS complex can be within normal limits. The new paradigm stresses the electrophysiological background in interpreting QRS changes, i.e., the effect of the non-spatial determinants. This postulates that the role of ECG is not to estimate LV size in LVH, but to understand and decode the underlying electrical processes, which are crucial in relation to cardiovascular risk assessment.
Keywords: ECG; left ventricular hypertrophy; new paradigm.
© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Niraj Varma, Elsayed Z. Soliman, Christian Jons, Philippe Chevalier are Editorial Board members of Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology and co‐authors of this article. To minimize bias, they were excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication.
Figures
References
-
- Adam Leigh, J. , O'Neal, W. T. , & Soliman, E. Z. (2016). Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular disease independent of left ventricular anatomy in subjects aged ≥65 years. The American Journal of Cardiology, 117(11), 1831–1835. 10.1016/J.AMJCARD.2016.03.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Arnett, D. K. , Blumenthal, R. S. , Albert, M. A. , Buroker, A. B. , Goldberger, Z. D. , Hahn, E. J. , Himmelfarb, C. D. , Khera, A. , Lloyd‐Jones, D. , McEvoy, J. W. , Michos, E. D. , Miedema, M. D. , Muñoz, D. , Smith, S. C. , Virani, S. S. , Williams, K. A. , Yeboah, J. , & Ziaeian, B. (2019). 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 140(11), e596–e646. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
