Future Role of Health Technology Assessment for Genomic Medicine in Oncology: A Canadian Laboratory Perspective
- PMID: 37999120
- PMCID: PMC10670221
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110700
Future Role of Health Technology Assessment for Genomic Medicine in Oncology: A Canadian Laboratory Perspective
Abstract
Genome-based testing in oncology is a rapidly expanding area of health care that is the basis of the emerging area of precision medicine. The efficient and considered adoption of novel genomic medicine testing is hampered in Canada by the fragmented nature of health care oversight as well as by lack of clear and transparent processes to support rapid evaluation, assessment, and implementation of genomic tests. This article provides an overview of some key barriers and proposes approaches to addressing these challenges as a potential pathway to developing a national approach to genomic medicine in oncology.
Keywords: analytic validity; clinical utility; clinical validity; genomic biomarkers; health technology assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following conflict of interest. D.H. has received funding, outside the submitted work, from pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies with an interest in genome-based testing and precision medicine, including Amgen Canada Inc., AstraZeneca Canada, Eli Lilly Canada Inc., GlaxoSmithKline Inc. (GSK Canada), Janssen Inc./J&J, Pfizer Canada ULC, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., and Roche Canada. Y.B. is cofounder of Genetics Adviser. T.S. has been a consultant for Health Canada (current) Advisory boards (with honoraria) within the past 36 months, related to diagnostic genetics, from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bayer, Pfizer, and Merck. M.C. has participated in advisory boards and/or received speaking honoraria from Amgen, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. E.N. and S.E.H. both receive funding from Alberta Precision Laboratories E.N. has received an honorarium from Bayer Pharmaceuticals and Grants/Research Support from AstraZeneca. D.L., P.P., A.S., C.W., A.P., S.Y., S.E.H., and H.F. have no conflicts to disclose that are relevant to this article.
References
-
- Bilkey G.A., Burns B.L., Coles E.P., Bowman F.L., Beilby J.P., Pachter N.S., Baynam G., Dawkins H.J.S., Nowak K.J., Weeramanthri T.S. Genomic Testing for Human Health and Disease Across the Life Cycle: Applications and Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stark Z., Schofield D., Alam K., Wilson W., Mupfeki N., Macciocca I., Shrestha R., White S.M., Gaff C. Prospective Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing with That of Usual Care Overwhelmingly Supports Early Use and Reimbursement. Genet. Med. 2017;19:867–874. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.221. - DOI - PubMed
-
- di Ruffano L.F., Harris I.M., Zhelev Z., Davenport C., Mallett S., Peters J., Takwoingi Y., Deeks J., Hyde C. Health Technology Assessment of Diagnostic Tests: A State of the Art Review of Methods Guidance from International Organizations. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 2023;39:e14. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000065. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
