Factors influencing community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implementation abandonment before achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status: case study of the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso
- PMID: 38001296
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-31142-y
Factors influencing community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implementation abandonment before achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status: case study of the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso
Abstract
Access to sanitation has become an important element for improving the health of populations in developing countries. In Burkina Faso, 12% of the population in rural areas has access to latrine and 65% practice open defecation (OD). In a bid to eliminate this unsanitary practice and enhance sanitation access in rural areas, the government embraced community-led total sanitation (CLTS) as a national strategy in 2014. However, more than 6 years later, a notable observation is the high abandonment rate, with only a small fraction of rural communities successfully eradicating OD. Out of the 8892 villages in the country, 3546 underwent a CLTS triggering from 2014 to 2020. Nevertheless, in 787 of these villages, the implementation of the CLTS approach was abandoned, indicating a substantial abandonment rate of 22.19%. Until now, most studies on CLTS have focused on the post-ODF phase, emphasizing the question of the sustainability of the results generated by the approach, as if the process from triggering to obtaining ODF certification was not subject to any problems. However, cases of abandonment of the CLTS process after triggering do exist, although poorly documented in the literature, and there are no studies that clearly assign responsibilities to the actors when CLTS implementation comes to be abandoned. This research aims to bridge these gaps by identifying the root causes of these abandonment cases while delineating the distinct responsibilities associated with these instances. To achieve this, the study was conducted in the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso, where all stakeholders involved in CLTS implementation, including target communities, were identified, their different roles in the process defined, and data collected through household surveys, interviews, and focus groups. The content analysis method was used to analyze the data. The research findings indicate that the abandonment of the CLTS implementation process is due to four categories of factors: sociocultural and economic aspects (39.78%), physical conditions (17.52%), governance aspects (26.28%), and the quality of approach implementation (16.42%). Moreover, these factors highlight a shared accountability for abandonment involving the government, implementing organizations, and target communities. These findings have significant implications for the future design of sanitation programs using the CLTS approach. To mitigate abandonment rates in the CLTS implementation process across rural communities, it is imperative for policymakers to attentively consider these factors and integrate the recommendations delineated in this study.
Keywords: Abandonment factors; Burkina Faso; Community-led total sanitation (CLTS); Open defecation; Rural communities.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Review of the slippage factors from open defecation-free (ODF) status towards open defecation (OD) after the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach implementation.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114160. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023. PMID: 36958189 Review.
-
Sustainability of facilities built under the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) implementation: Moving from basic to safe facilities on the sanitation ladder.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293395. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37972150 Free PMC article.
-
Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261674. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 34995310 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Implementation Factors for the Success of Community-Led Total Sanitation on Latrine Coverage. A Case Study from Rural Ghana.Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5466-5472. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01055. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Environ Sci Technol. 2019. PMID: 30946581 Free PMC article.
-
Community-Led Total Sanitation: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Evidence and Its Quality.Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Feb 2;126(2):026001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1965. Environ Health Perspect. 2018. PMID: 29398655 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effect of Health Profession Students' Community Engagement on Open Defecation-Free Status: A Quantitative Assessment of a Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene Program in Southwestern Uganda.Cureus. 2025 Jun 12;17(6):e85858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85858. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40656406 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of community-led total sanitation on open defecation in Uganda: A propensity score-matched analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0329307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329307. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40705806 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abebe TA, Tucho GT (2020) Open defecation-free slippage and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Syst Rev 9:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01511-6 - DOI
-
- Adeyeye A (2011) Gender and community-led total sanitation: a case study of Ekiti State, Nigeria. Trop Resour 30:18–27
-
- Adjibolosoo SV, Ofori BD, Adongo PB et al (2020) The influence of culture on open defaecation in some basic schools in selected districts in Ghana: a preliminary study. PLoS One 15:e0239491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239491 - DOI
-
- Augsburg B, Rodríguez-Lesmes P (2020) Sanitation dynamics: toilet acquisition and its economic and social implications in rural and urban contexts. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 10:628–641. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2020.098 - DOI
-
- Aunger R, Curtis V (2016) Behaviour centred design: towards an applied science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev 10:425–446 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources