Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):2330.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17274-3.

Exploring the use of masks for protection against the effects of wildfire smoke among people with preexisting respiratory conditions

Affiliations

Exploring the use of masks for protection against the effects of wildfire smoke among people with preexisting respiratory conditions

Holly Seale et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The impact of wildfire smoke is a growing public health issue, especially for those living with preexisting respiratory conditions. Understanding perceptions and behaviors relevant to the use of individual protective strategies, and how these affect the adoption of these strategies, is critical for the development of future communication and support interventions. This study focused on the use of masks by people living in the Australian community with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: Semi-structured phone interviews were undertaken with people living in the community aged 18 years and over. Participants lived in a bushfire-prone area and reported having been diagnosed with asthma or COPD.

Results: Twenty interviews were undertaken between July and September 2021. We found that, during wildfire episodes, there was an overwhelming reliance on closing windows and staying inside as a means of mitigating exposure to smoke. There was limited use of masks for this purpose. Even among those who had worn a mask, there was little consideration given to the type of mask or respirator used. Reliance on sensory experiences with smoke was a common prompt to adopting an avoidance behavior. Participants lacked confidence in the information available from air-quality apps and websites, however they were receptive to the idea of using masks in the future.

Conclusions: Whilst COVID-19 has changed the nature of community mask use over the last couple of years, there is no guarantee that this event will influence an individual's mask behavior during other events like bushfires. Instead, we must create social support processes for early and appropriate mask use, including the use of air quality monitoring.

Keywords: Air pollution; Communication; Masks; Public health; Respiratory health; Wildfire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hub ADRK, Bushfire. Australian Government; [Available from: https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/bushfire/#:~:text=A%20bushfire%20is%20an%20unplanned,lives%2 C%20property%20and%20the%20environment.
    1. Malilay J. A review of factors affecting the human health impacts of air pollutants from forest Fires. Switzerland: Geneva; 1999.
    1. Reid CE, Brauer M, Johnston FH, Jerrett M, Balmes JR, Elliott CT. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(9):1334–43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409277. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dennekamp M, Abramson MJ. The effects of bushfire smoke on respiratory health. Respirology. 2011;16:198–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01868.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Workman A, Russell MA, Williamson M, Pan H, Reifels L. The long-term impact of bushfires on the mental health of australians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022;13(1):2087980. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2087980. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types