Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 24;9(1):192.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01411-1.

Evaluation of a carepartner-integrated telehealth gait rehabilitation program for persons with stroke: study protocol for a feasibility study

Sarah Blanton  1 , George Cotsonis  2 , Kayla Brennan  3 , Robert Song  3 , Laura Zajac-Cox  4 , Sarah Caston  4 , Heather Stewart  3 , Arun Jayaraman  5 , Darcy Reisman  6 , Patricia C Clark  7 , Trisha Kesar  4
Affiliations

Evaluation of a carepartner-integrated telehealth gait rehabilitation program for persons with stroke: study protocol for a feasibility study

Sarah Blanton et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Despite family carepartners of individuals post-stroke experiencing high levels of strain and reduced quality of life, stroke rehabilitation interventions rarely address carepartner well-being or offer training to support their engagement in therapeutic activities. Our group has developed creative intervention approaches to support families during stroke recovery, thereby improving physical and psychosocial outcomes for both carepartners and stroke survivors. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of an adapted, home-based intervention (Carepartner Collaborative Integrative Therapy for Gait-CARE-CITE-Gait) designed to facilitate positive carepartner involvement during home-based training targeting gait and mobility.

Methods: This two-phased design will determine the feasibility of CARE-CITE-Gait, a novel intervention that leverages principles from our previous carepartner-focused upper extremity intervention. During the 4-week CARE-CITE-Gait intervention, carepartners review online video-based modules designed to illustrate strategies for an autonomy-supportive environment during functional mobility task practice, and the study team completes two 2-h home visits for dyad collaborative goal setting. In phase I, content validity, usability, and acceptability of the CARE-CITE-Gait modules will be evaluated by stroke rehabilitation content experts and carepartners. In phase II, feasibility (based on measures of recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, and safety) will be measured. Preliminary effects of the CARE-CITE-Gait will be gathered using a single-group, quasi-experimental design with repeated measures (two baseline visits 1 week apart, posttest, and 1-month follow-up) with 15 carepartner and stroke survivor dyads. Outcome data collectors will be blinded. Outcomes include psychosocial variables (family conflict surrounding stroke recovery, strain, autonomy support, and quality of life) collected from carepartners and measures of functional mobility, gait speed, stepping activity, and health-related quality of life collected from stroke survivors.

Discussion: The findings of the feasibility testing and preliminary data on the effects of CARE-CITE-Gait will provide justification and information to guide a future definitive randomized clinical trial. The knowledge gained from this study will enhance our understanding of and aid the development of rehabilitation approaches that address both carepartner and stroke survivor needs during the stroke recovery process.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05257928. Registered 25 February 2022.

Trial status: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05257928) on March 25, 2022. Recruitment of participants was initiated on May 18, 2022.

Keywords: Caregiver; Dyads; Gait; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart: Evaluation of a Carepartner-Integrated Telehealth Gait Rehabilitation Program for Persons with Stroke (CARE-CITE-Gait) (N = 15)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

    1. Turan TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, et al. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017;88(4):379–385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fini NA, Bernhardt J, Said CM, Billinger SA. How to address physical activity participation after stroke in research and clinical practice. Stroke. 2021;52(6):e274–e277. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034557. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2532–2553. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017;97(7):707–717. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant JS, Hunt CW, Steadman L. Common caregiver issues and nursing interventions after a stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(8):e151–153. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005094. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data