Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;15(22):5349.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15225349.

Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

Affiliations

Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes

Basilio Dueñas-Rodríguez et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

We evaluate postoperative complications, aesthetic results and satisfaction outcomes in patients with breast cancer after intervening with a skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with an immediate prosthetic reconstruction with or without a biological mesh. Patients with multifocal breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ with an indication for a mastectomy and cT2 tumors with no response to primary systemic treatment were included, whereas patients aged >75 years, with inflammatory carcinoma, and severe circulatory disorders were excluded. Patients in the control group were reconstructed using a prosthesis, whereas the study group included patients reconstructed using a prosthesis and biological acellular porcine dermal mesh (Strattice™). In both groups, the result was assessed using the BREAST-Q instrument. A total of 51 patients (62 intervened breasts) were included in the study group and 38 patients (41 intervened breasts) in the control group. Implant loss and removal occurred in three patients in the study group (5.9%) and nine patients in the control group (24.3%; p = 0.030). Infections appeared in three patients in the study group (4.8%) and three patients in the control group (7.3%; p = 1.00). Skin necrosis appeared in 5 patients in the study group (12.2%) and 11 patients in the control group (21.6%; p = 0.367). Seroma appeared in five patients in the study group (12.2%) and five patients in the control group (8.1%; p = 0.514). The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a comparison between both groups regarding "satisfaction with breasts after surgery" (p = 0.026), "sexual well-being after intervention" (p = 0.010) and "satisfaction with the information received" (p = 0.049). We have noted a statistically significant decrease in implant loss in women receiving an implant with a biological mesh. A higher satisfaction was observed in patients reconstructed using Strattice™, with statistically significant differences in three items.

Keywords: BREAST-Q questionnaire; biological mesh; breast cancer; immediate reconstruction; skin-sparing mastectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(AD) Nipple-sparing mastectomy by lateral approach. Biological mesh Strattice™ fixed to the pectoralis major muscle edge and then to the inframammary fold. Anatomical implant placement. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaidar-Person O., Offersen B.V., Boersma L.J., de Ruysscher D., Tramm T., Kuhn T., Gentilini O., Matrai Z., Poortmans P. A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges. Breast. 2021;56:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu H., Wan H., Zuo W., Sun W., Owens R.T., Harper J.R., Ayares D.L., McQuillan D.J. A Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Scaffold That Supports Soft Tissue Regeneration: Removal of Terminal Galactose-alpha-(1,3)-Galactose and Retention of Matrix Structure. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2009;15:1807–1819. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0384. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connor J., McQuillan D., Sandor M., Wan H., Lombardi J., Bachrach N., Harper J., Xu H. Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model. Regen. Med. 2009;4:185–195. doi: 10.2217/17460751.4.2.185. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karanlik H., Bayrak S., Fayda M., Ozgur I., Kurul S. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without vicryl mesh. Breast. 2015;24:S132. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(15)70338-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nebril B.A., Novoa A.G., Jimenez L.G., Carballada C.D., Alejandro A.B., Iglesias C.C. Reconstruccion mamaria inmediata mediante implante prepectoral de poliuretano. Resultados preliminares del estudio prospectivo PreQ-20. Cir. Esp. 2023;101:187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2022.02.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources