Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
- PMID: 38001723
- PMCID: PMC10670701
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225462
Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
Abstract
Background: Data on Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) amount in biopsy tissue is important for prostate cancer (PC) risk assessment. We aim to investigate which GP4 quantification method predicts adverse pathology (AP) at radical prostatectomy (RP) the best in men diagnosed with intermediate-risk (IR) PC at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy.
Methods: We retrospectively included 123 patients diagnosed with IR PC (prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/mL, grade group (GG) 2 or 3, no iT3 on MRI) at MRI-guided biopsy, who underwent RP. Twelve GP4 amount-related parameters were developed, based on GP4 quantification method (absolute, relative to core, or cancer length) and site (overall, targeted, systematic biopsy, or worst specimen). Additionally, we calculated PV×GP4 (prostate volume × GP4 relative to core length in overall biopsy), aiming to represent the total GP4 volume in the prostate. The associations of GP4 with AP (GG ≥ 4, ≥pT3a, or pN1) were investigated.
Results: AP was reported in 39 (31.7%) of patients. GP4 relative to cancer length was not associated with AP. Of the 12 parameters, the highest ROC AUC value was seen for GP4 relative to core length in overall biopsy (0.65). an even higher AUC value was noted for PV × GP4 (0.67), with a negative predictive value of 82.8% at the optimal threshold.
Conclusions: The lack of an association of GP4 relative to cancer length with AP, contrasted with the better performance of other parameters, indicates directions for future research on PC risk stratification to accurately identify patients who may not require immediate treatment. Incorporating formulas aimed at GP4 volume assessment may lead to obtaining models with the best discrimination ability.
Keywords: Gleason pattern 4; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; risk stratification.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of highest and overall percentage Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer biopsies.Virchows Arch. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04117-2. Online ahead of print. Virchows Arch. 2025. PMID: 40478475
-
Significance of the Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Adverse Pathology on Radical Prostatectomy: Application in Active Surveillance.Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 Jul 5;160(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad005. Am J Clin Pathol. 2023. PMID: 36897217
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Total Length Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):309-316. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002685. Epub 2022 Apr 1. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35363038 Free PMC article.
-
The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Apr 1;145(4):461-493. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0015-RA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 32589068 Review.
-
Risk of adverse pathology at prostatectomy in the era of MRI and targeted biopsies; rethinking active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients.Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;39(10):729.e1-729.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 16. Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33736975 Review.
References
-
- European Association of Urology . EAU Guidelines. EAU Annual Congress; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2022.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous