Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;11(11):3009.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11113009.

Nerve Growth Factor, Antimicrobial Peptides and Chemotherapy: Glioblastoma Combination Therapy to Improve Their Efficacy

Affiliations

Nerve Growth Factor, Antimicrobial Peptides and Chemotherapy: Glioblastoma Combination Therapy to Improve Their Efficacy

Alexandr Chernov et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy of the central nervous system with a median survival rate of 15 months. We investigated the combined anticancer effects of nerve growth factor (NGF), cathelicidin (LL-37), and protegrin-1 (PG-1) with chemotherapy (temozolomide, doxorubicin, carboplatin, cisplatin, and etoposide) in the glioblastoma U251 cell line to overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy and to guarantee specific treatments to succeed. The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was used to study cell viability and to determine the cytotoxic effects of NGF, LL-37, and PG-1 and their combination with chemotherapy in U251 cells. Synergism or antagonism was determined using the combination index (CI) method. Caspase-3 activity was evaluated spectrophotometrically using a caspase-3 activity assay kit. Apoptosis was analyzed with flow cytometry using propidium iodide (PI) and YO-PRO-1. NGF and the peptides showed a strong cytotoxic effect on U251 glioma cells in the MTT test (IC50 0.0214, 3.1, and 26.1 μM, respectively) compared to chemotherapy. The combination of PG-1 + etoposide had a synergistic effect on apoptosis of U251 glioma cells. It should be noted that the cells were in the early and late stages of apoptosis, respectively, compared with the control cells. The caspase-3 activation analysis revealed that the caspase-3 level was not significantly (p > 0.05) increased in U251 cells following PG-1 with etoposide treatment compared with that in the untreated cells, suggesting that the combination of PG-1 and etoposide may induce caspase-independent apoptosis in U251 cells. NGF, LL-37, and PG-1 represent promising drug candidates as the treatment regimen for GBM. Furthermore, the synergistic efficacy of the combined protocol using PG-1 and etoposide may overcome some of the typical limitations of the conventional therapeutic protocols, thus representing a promising approach for GBM therapy.

Keywords: antimicrobial peptides; chemotherapy; glioblastoma; nerve growth factor; synergistic effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph of viability versus drug concentration. Cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. Dose-dependent effect of NGF (A), LL-37 (B), and PG-1 (C) and their combination with chemotherapy on cell viability at 24 h time-course. Data shown are representative of three separate experiments, and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistically significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 combination effects from drug alone; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001—statistically significant difference drug or combination from control.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph of viability versus drug concentration. Cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. Dose-dependent effect of NGF (A), LL-37 (B), and PG-1 (C) and their combination with chemotherapy on cell viability at 24 h time-course. Data shown are representative of three separate experiments, and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistically significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 combination effects from drug alone; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001—statistically significant difference drug or combination from control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Computed CI values for the combination of NGF on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (A); LL-37 with NGF and PG-1 on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (B); PG-1 with LL-37 and NGF on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (C). The results are presented as the means (columns) ± S.D. (bars) (n = 3, in triplicate). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 statistically significant differences between CI value of drug or its combinations and control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Computed CI values for the combination of NGF on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (A); LL-37 with NGF and PG-1 on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (B); PG-1 with LL-37 and NGF on U251 human glioma cells according to the results of the MTT test (C). The results are presented as the means (columns) ± S.D. (bars) (n = 3, in triplicate). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 statistically significant differences between CI value of drug or its combinations and control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Apoptosis, necrosis, and necroptosis analysis with flow cytometry using PI and YO-PRO-1. U251 cells were treated with etoposide (B) and PG-1 (C) individually and in combination (D) (etoposide + PG-1) for 24 h compared with that in the normal controls (A). C3 represents the rate of viable cells; C1 and C2 represent the rate of late apoptosis or necrosis; C4 represents the rate of early apoptosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Caspase-3 activity of U251 cells; Data shown are representative of three separate experiments, and values are given as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, statistically significant difference between control and PG-1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2016 Brain and Other CNS Cancer Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other CNS cancer, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:376–393. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30468-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., Znaor A., Soerjomataram I., Bray F. Global cancer observatory: Cancer today. Lyon Fr. Int. Agency Res. Cancer. 2018;3:2019.
    1. Nabors L.B., Portnow J., Ahluwalia M., Baehring J., Brem H., Brem S., Butowski N., Campian J.L., Clark S.W., Fabiano A.J., et al. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. JNCCN. 2020;18:1537–1570. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R., Taillibert S., Kanner A., Read W., Steinberg D., Lhermitte B., Toms S., Idbaih A., Ahluwalia M.S., Fink K., et al. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X., Zhang M., Gan H., Wang H., Lee J.H., Fang D., Kitange G.J., He L., Hu Z., Parney I.F., et al. A novel enhancer regulates MGMT expression and promotes temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05373-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed