Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 26;13(11):1512.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111512.

Assessing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Age with Intracranial Vessel Tortuosity and Thickness Information

Affiliations

Assessing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Age with Intracranial Vessel Tortuosity and Thickness Information

Hoon-Seok Yoon et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models that predict age using intracranial vessels' tortuosity and diameter features derived from magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data. A total of 171 subjects' three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight MRA image data were considered for analysis. After annotations of two endpoints in each arterial segment, tortuosity features such as the sum of the angle metrics, triangular index, relative length, and product of the angle distance, as well as the vessels' diameter features, were extracted and used to train and validate the ML models for age prediction. Features extracted from the right and left internal carotid arteries (ICA) and basilar arteries were considered as the inputs to train and validate six ML regression models with a four-fold cross validation. The random forest regression model resulted in the lowest root mean square error of 14.9 years and the highest average coefficient of determination of 0.186. The linear regression model showed the lowest average mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and the highest average Pearson correlation coefficient (0.532). The mean diameter of the right ICA vessel segment was the most important feature contributing to prediction of age in two out of the four regression models considered. An ML of tortuosity descriptors and diameter features extracted from MRA data showed a modest correlation between real age and ML-predicted age. Further studies are warranted for the assessment of the model's age predictions in patients with intracranial vessel diseases.

Keywords: age prediction; feature extraction; intracranial artery; machine learning; magnetic resonance angiography; medical image analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart of the overall process. The light green boxes are primarily related to the machine learning predictions of age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of the annotated vessel segments. A1, anterior cerebral artery (ACA) A1; M1, middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1; ICA, internal carotid artery; PComm, posterior communicating artery; P1, posterior cerebral artery (PCA) P1; P2, PCA P2; BA, basilar artery; R, right; L, left.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The spline interpolation for smoothing the centerline in a basilar artery. The skeleton is discretized in the 3D coordinate space, and hence, when displayed, it shows a jagged appearance, as indicated by the blue line. A spline interpolation results in the smooth curve which is indicated by the red line.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatter plots of the age predictions of the (a) random forest regression, (b) linear regression, and (c) XGBoost regression models. The top plots are models’ predictions on the training data, and the bottom plots are the models’ predictions on the test data. The blue dots are samples, and the red line is the y = x line.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Lists of the ten most important features for the (a) random forest regression, (b) AdaBoost regression, (c) gradient boosting regression, and (d) XGBoost regression models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guillén M.F. 2030: How Today’s Biggest Trends Will Collide and Reshape the Future of Everything. St. Martin’s Press; New York, NY, USA: 2020.
    1. Baecker L., Garcia-Dias R., Vieira S., Scarpazza C., Mechelli A. Machine learning for brain age prediction: Introduction to methods and clinical applications. eBioMedicine. 2021;72:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103600. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacDonald M.E., Pike G.B. MRI of healthy brain aging: A review. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4564. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hepp T., Blum D., Armanious K., Scholkopf B., Stern D., Yang B., Gatidis S. Uncertainty estimation and explainability in deep learning-based age estimation of the human brain: Results from the German National Cohort MRI study. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2021;92:101967. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101967. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sajedi H., Pardakhti N. Age Prediction Based on Brain MRI Image: A Survey. J. Med. Syst. 2019;43:279. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1401-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources