Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 19;15(22):4837.
doi: 10.3390/nu15224837.

The Intuitive Eating Scale-2 Adapted for Mexican Pregnant Women: Psychometric Properties and Influence of Sociodemographic Variables

Affiliations

The Intuitive Eating Scale-2 Adapted for Mexican Pregnant Women: Psychometric Properties and Influence of Sociodemographic Variables

María Eugenia Flores-Quijano et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

A weight-inclusive approach to health involves the promotion of intuitive eating, i.e., the individual's ability to be aware of their physiological hunger and satiety cues to determine when and how much to eat, while paying attention to how certain foods affect their body. The second version of the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES-2) evaluates four interrelated traits of intuitive eating: Unconditional Permission to Eat (UPE), Eating for Physical rather than emotional Reasons (EPR), Reliance on internal Hunger/Satiety Cues (RHSC), and Body-Food Choice Congruence (BFCC). In this study, our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Mexican Spanish adaptation of the IES-2 for pregnant women and examine the relationship between intuitive eating traits and maternal sociodemographic characteristics. A sample of 514 pregnant women answered our IES-2 adaptation and a sociodemographic questionnaire. We determined the quality, validity, and reliability of our adaptation through descriptive measures, frequency distributions, intra-class correlations, and extreme answer group comparison for each item, eliminating those with weak technical properties. We then performed an exploratory principal component analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis. Last, we analyzed the association between intuitive eating and maternal sociodemographic and reproductive variables through correlation tests and multivariable linear regressions. Psychometric tests confirmed the validity and reliability of our IES-2 adaptation, which comprised 18 out of the 23 original items. Notably, both the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded not four but five factors, due to the EPR subscale splitting in two (the "emotional" and "physical" components of EPR). We attribute this novel finding to the emotional manifestations that naturally accompany pregnancy, which may incline pregnant women to base their eating behaviors more on the emotional than the physical component that would otherwise dominate their EPR trait. Further research is also needed about the UPE subscale during pregnancy, due to item removal and subtle changes in meaning. Finally, the influence of sociodemographic variables on the IES-2 score was extremely low, suggesting that other variables, possibly of a psychological nature, may have greater influence on a pregnant woman's intuitive eating.

Keywords: eating behaviors; intuitive eating; intuitive eating scale; pregnancy; psychometric properties; sociodemographic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confirmatory factor analysis. Numbers represent factor loads for the 18 items in the adapted version of the IES-2 (left) and inter-factor correlations (right). RHSC = Reliance on Hunger and Satiety Cues. EPR-Emo = Eating for Physical Rather Than Emotional Reasons (emotional component). B-FCC = Body–Food Choice Congruence. EPR-Phy = Eating for Physical Rather Than Emotional Reasons (physical component). UPE = Unconditional Permission to Eat.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bacon L., Aphramor L. Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift. Nutr. J. 2011;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tylka T.L., Annunziato R.A., Burgard D., Daníelsdóttir S., Shuman E., Davis C., Calogero R.M. The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss. J. Obes. 2014;2014:983495. doi: 10.1155/2014/983495. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Research Council. Institute of Medicine. Board on Children, Youth, and Families. Food and Nutrition Board. Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines . Weight Gain during Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2010.
    1. International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group Effect of Diet and Physical Activity Based Interventions in Pregnancy on Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Randomised Trials. BMJ. 2017;358:j3119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tylka T.L. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Measure of Intuitive Eating. J. Couns. Psychol. 2006;53:226–240. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.226. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources