Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 10;28(22):7521.
doi: 10.3390/molecules28227521.

Resveratrol, ε-Viniferin, and Vitisin B from Vine: Comparison of Their In Vitro Antioxidant Activities and Study of Their Interactions

Affiliations

Resveratrol, ε-Viniferin, and Vitisin B from Vine: Comparison of Their In Vitro Antioxidant Activities and Study of Their Interactions

Biranty Sy et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

The control of oxidative stress with natural active substances could limit the development of numerous pathologies. Our objective was to study the antiradical effects of resveratrol (RSV), ε-viniferin (VNF), and vitisin B (VB) alone or in combination, and those of a standardized stilbene-enriched vine extract (SSVE). In the DPPH-, FRAP-, and NO-scavenging assays, RSV presented the highest activity with an IC50 of 81.92 ± 9.17, 13.36 ± 0.91, and 200.68 ± 15.40 µM, respectively. All binary combinations resulted in additive interactions in the DPPH- and NO-scavenging assays. In the FRAP assay, a synergic interaction for RSV + VNF, an additive for VNF + VB, and an antagonistic for RSV + VB were observed. The ternary combination of RSV + VNF + VB elicited an additive interaction in the DPPH assay and a synergic interaction in the FRAP- and NO-scavenging assays. There was no significant difference between the antioxidant activity of the SSVE and that of the combination of RSV + VNF. In conclusion, RSV presented the highest effects, followed by VNF and VB. The interactions revealed additive or synergistic effects, depending on the combination of the stilbenes and assay.

Keywords: antioxidant; interactions; resveratrol; stilbenes; vitisin B; ε-viniferin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 7
Figure 7
Summary of IC50 values for resveratrol in the DPPH assay according to the literature [4,12,13,14,15,16,21,25].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Molecular structures of stilbenes isolated from Vitis vinifera vine shoots. (A) Resveratrol; (B) ε-viniferin; (C) vitisin B.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Antioxidant capacity of individual stilbenes (RSV, resveratrol; VNF, ε-viniferin; VB, vitisin B). (A) DPPH assay; (B) FRAP assay; (C) NO-scavenging assay.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DPPH radical reduction and antioxidant capacity of individual stilbenes (RSV, resveratrol; VNF, ε-viniferin; VB, vitisin B) and their equimolar combinations. The 100% marker represents the DPPH alone, which was used as a control. The result of the representative experiment is shown. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data were analyzed with an ANOVA (p < 0.05). Each letter (a, b, and c) indicates that the combinations were statistically different from the individual compounds (a for resveratrol, b for VNF, and c for VB) according to a post hoc Tukey comparison test at p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ferric iron reduction capacity of individual stilbenes (RSV, resveratrol; VNF, ε-viniferin; VB, vitisin B) and their equimolar combinations. The 100% marker represents the Trolox that was used as a positive control. The result of the representative experiment is shown. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Data were analyzed with an ANOVA (p < 0.05). Each letter (a, b, and c) indicates that the combinations were statistically different from the individual compounds (a for resveratrol, b for VNF, and c for VB) according to a post hoc Tukey comparison test at p < 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
NO-scavenging capacity of individual stilbenes (RSV, resveratrol; VNF, ε-viniferin; VB, vitisin B) and their equimolar combinations. The 100% marker represents the SNP alone, which was used as a positive control. The result of the representative experiment is illustrated. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Data were analyzed with an ANOVA (p < 0.05). Each letter (a, b, and c) indicates that the combinations were statistically different from the individual compounds (a for resveratrol, b for VNF, and c for VB) according to a post hoc Tukey comparison test at p < 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of the antioxidant activities between the combination (RSV + VNF) and the standardized stilbene-enriched vine extract (SSVE). Data were analyzed with an ANOVA (p < 0.05). The letter a indicates that the combination was statistically different from the SSVE according to a post hoc Tukey comparison test at p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biswas S.K. Does the Interdependence between Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Explain the Antioxidant Paradox? Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016;2016:5698931. doi: 10.1155/2016/5698931. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prior R., Wu X. Diet Antioxidant Capacity: Relationships to Oxidative Stress and Health. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013;5:126–139. doi: 10.5099/aj130200126. - DOI
    1. Tsao R. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Dietary Polyphenols. Nutrients. 2010;2:1231–1246. doi: 10.3390/nu2121231. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurin E., Mučaji P., Nagy M. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of Three Red Wine Polyphenols and Their Mixtures: An Interaction Study. Molecules. 2012;17:14336–14348. doi: 10.3390/molecules171214336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magalhães L.M., Segundo M.A., Reis S., Lima J.L.F.C. Methodological Aspects about in Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Properties. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2008;613:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.047. - DOI - PubMed