Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 10;23(22):9106.
doi: 10.3390/s23229106.

Isometric Shoulder Testing Using a Forcemeter Is a Reliable Method of Strength Evaluation

Joanna Wałecka  1   2 , Przemysław Lubiatowski  1   2 , Ewa Bręborowicz  2 , Piotr Kaczmarek  1 , Monika Grygorowicz  1 , Leszek Romanowski  2
Affiliations

Isometric Shoulder Testing Using a Forcemeter Is a Reliable Method of Strength Evaluation

Joanna Wałecka et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Isometric strength testing using a digital dynamometer is reliable for muscle function evaluation. It allows us to objectify manual strength assessment measurement. We tested intra- and inter-observer reliability of a user-friendly efficient digital dynamometer-the Forcemeter-equipped with a computer program to monitor the measurements and to store the data. Abduction, forward flexion, and external and internal rotation of both shoulders were tested three times in 20 healthy volunteers with no record of shoulder trauma. Isometric contracture was recorded in newtons. The first and the third test were carried out by Examiner A (intra-rater reliability); the second test, by Examiner B (inter-rater reliability). Good reliability was shown for intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values which mean moderate to high correlations (r = 0.66-0.93) for both examiners. Moderate to high correlations (r = 0.72-0.91) were found for comparisons between the results obtained by Examiner A.

Keywords: Forcemeter; isometric strength; reliability; shoulder strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Isometric testing for abduction (A), flexion (B), internal rotation, (C) and external rotation (D).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beasley W. Quantitative muscle testing: Principles and applications to research and clinical services. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1961;42:398–425. - PubMed
    1. Borden R., Colachis S.C. Quantitative measurement of the good and normal ranges in muscle testing. Phys. Ther. 1968;48:839–843. doi: 10.1093/ptj/48.8.839. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelly B., Kadrmas W.R., Speer K.P. The manual muscle examination for rotator cuff strength: An electormyographic investigation. Am. J. Sports Med. 1996;24:581–588. doi: 10.1177/036354659602400504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayhew T., Rothstein J. In: Measurement of Muscle Performance with Instruments. Measuremen Rothstein J., editor. Churchill Livingstone Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 1985.
    1. Leggin B.G., Neuman R.M., Iannotti J.P., Williams G.R., Thompson E.C. Intrarater and interrater reliability of three isometric dynamometers in assessing shoulder strength. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 1967;5:18–24. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(96)80026-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources