Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 17;23(22):9246.
doi: 10.3390/s23229246.

Uncertainty Quantification of Methods Used to Measure Methane Emissions of 1 g CH4 h-1

Stuart N Riddick  1 , Mercy Mbua  1 , John C Riddick  2 , Cade Houlihan  1 , Anna L Hodshire  1 , Daniel J Zimmerle  1
Affiliations

Uncertainty Quantification of Methods Used to Measure Methane Emissions of 1 g CH4 h-1

Stuart N Riddick et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The recent interest in measuring methane (CH4) emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells has resulted in five methods being typically used. In line with the US Federal Orphaned Wells Program's (FOWP) guidelines and the American Carbon Registry's (ACR) protocols, quantification methods must be able to measure minimum emissions of 1 g of CH4 h-1 to within ±20%. To investigate if the methods meet the required standard, dynamic chambers, a Hi-Flow (HF) sampler, and a Gaussian plume (GP)-based approach were all used to quantify a controlled emission (Qav; g h-1) of 1 g of CH4 h-1. After triplicate experiments, the average accuracy (Ar; %) and the upper (Uu; %) and lower (Ul; %) uncertainty bounds of all methods were calculated. Two dynamic chambers were used, one following the ACR guidelines, and a second "mobile" chamber made from lightweight materials that could be constructed around a source of emission on a well head. The average emission calculated from the measurements made using the dynamic chamber (Qav = 1.01 g CH4 h-1, Ar = +0.9%), the mobile chamber (Qav = 0.99 g CH4 h-1, Ar = -1.4%), the GP approach (Qav = 0.97 g CH4 h-1, Ar = -2.6%), and the HF sampler (Qav = 1.02 g CH4 h-1, Ar = +2.2%) were all within ±3% of 1 g of CH4 h-1 and met the requirements of the FOWP and ACR protocols. The results also suggest that the individual measurements made using the dynamic chamber can quantify emissions of 1 g of CH4 h-1 to within ±6% irrespective of the design (material, number of parts, geometrical shape, and hose length), and changes to the construction or material specifications as defined via ACR make no discernible difference to the quantification uncertainty. Our tests show that a collapsible chamber can be easily constructed around the emission source on an abandoned well and be used to quantify emissions from abandoned wells in remote areas. To our knowledge, this is the first time that methods for measuring the CH4 emissions of 1 g of CH4 h-1 have been quantitively assessed against a known reference source and against each other.

Keywords: abandoned wells; methane; quantification; uncertainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the dynamic/mobile flux chambers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methane concentration change inside a chamber with a volume of 0.12 m3 placed over an emission of 1 g CH4 h−1. After 3 min, a pump of 8.5 L min−1 was turned on.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methane concentration change inside a chamber with a volume of 0.12 m3 with a flow of air of 6 L min−1 placed over an emission of 1 g CH4 h−1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. IPCC . Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2014. - DOI
    1. EPA Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–2020: Updates Under Consideration for Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells. [(accessed on 26 October 2022)];2021 Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-09/2022-ghgi-update-aban....
    1. Townsend-Small A., Ferrara T.W., Lyon D.R., Fries A.E., Lamb B.K. Emissions of coalbed and natural gas methane from abandoned oil and gas wells in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016;43:2283–2290. doi: 10.1002/2015GL067623. - DOI
    1. Riddick S.N., Mauzerall D.L., Celia M.A., Kang M., Bressler K., Chu C., Gum C.D. Measuring methane emissions from abandoned and active oil and gas wells in West Virginia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;651:1849–1856. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.082. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Interior Assessing Methane Emissions from Orphaned Wells to Meet Reporting Requirements of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (BIL): Federal Program Guidelines. [(accessed on 5 May 2023)];2022 Available online: https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/federal-orphaned-wells-methane-m....