Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 9;12(22):3807.
doi: 10.3390/plants12223807.

Evaluating the Response of Glycine soja Accessions to Fungal Pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina during Seedling Growth

Affiliations

Evaluating the Response of Glycine soja Accessions to Fungal Pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina during Seedling Growth

Shirley Jacquet et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Charcoal rot caused by the fungal pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid is one of various devastating soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) diseases, which can severely reduce crop yield. The investigation into the genetic potential for charcoal rot resistance of wild soybean (Glycine soja) accessions will enrich our understanding of the impact of soybean domestication on disease resistance; moreover, the identified charcoal rot-resistant lines can be used to improve soybean resistance to charcoal rot. The objective of this study was to evaluate the resistance of wild soybean accessions to M. phaseolina at the seedling stage and thereby select the disease-resistant lines. The results show that the fungal pathogen infection reduced the growth of the root and hypocotyl in most G. soja accessions. The accession PI 507794 displayed the highest level of resistance response to M. phaseolina infection among the tested wild soybean accessions, while PI 487431 and PI 483660B were susceptible to charcoal rot in terms of the reduction in root and hypocotyl growth. The mean values of the root and hypocotyl parameters in PI 507794 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of PI 487431 and PI 483460B. A analysis of the resistance of wild soybean accessions to M. phaseolina using the root and hypocotyl as the assessment parameters at the early seedling stage provides an alternative way to rapidly identify potential resistant genotypes and facilitate breeding for soybean resistance to charcoal rot.

Keywords: Glycine soja; Macrophomina phaseolina; WinRHIZO; charcoal rot resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The wild soybean root and hypocotyl and distribution of hypocotyl and root as the assessed parameters measured by using a ruler. The unit of a ruler used in the assessment was centimeter (cM). (A). Anatomic sections of root and hypocotyl; (B). Distribution of the length of root; (C). Distribution of the length of hypocotyl.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of assessed parameters of G. soja between nontreated control and charcoal rot treatment. The black bar in each boxplot presents the mean value of the assessed parameters. The abbreviation and units of assessment parameters were described as follows: C: control; P: pathogen treatment; Volume (cM3), Length (cM), ProjArea (cM2), SurfArea (cM2), AvgDiam (mm), and LenPerVol (cM/m3). (A). Room parameters; (B). Hypocotyl parameters.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlations between assessed parameters under nontreated condition at room temperature. (A). Root parameters; (B). Hypocotyl parameters. Significance level: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCA of assessed parameters in G. soja line selection for charcoal rot resistance. The PCA graphs were made using ggbiplot of R program [30] based on prcomp algorithm (cran.r-project.org), and only PC1 vs. PC2 are presented. (A). PCA for root parameters; (B). PCA for hypocotyl parameters.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCA of assessed parameters in G. soja line selection for charcoal rot resistance. The PCA graphs were made using ggbiplot of R program [30] based on prcomp algorithm (cran.r-project.org), and only PC1 vs. PC2 are presented. (A). PCA for root parameters; (B). PCA for hypocotyl parameters.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of G. soja lines for assessed parameters under charcoal treatment. (A). Root parameters; (B). Hypocotyl parameters. Different letters represented statistically different.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kofsky J., Zhang H., Song B.-H. The untapped genetic reservoir: The past, current, and future applications of the wild soybean (Glycine soja) Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:949. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00949. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyten D.L., Song Q., Zhu Y., Choi I.Y., Nelson R.L., Costa J.M., Specht J.E., Shoemaker R.C., Cregan P.B. Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:16666–16671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604379103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter T.E., Hymowitz T., Nelson R.L. Biogeography, local adaptation, vavilov, and genetic diversity in soybean. In: Boerma R., Specht J., editors. Biological Resources and Migration. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2004. pp. 47–59.
    1. Li Y.H., Qiu L.J. Molecular footprints of domestication and improvement in soybean revealed by whole genome re-sequencing. BMC Genom. 2013;14:579. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-579. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh R.J., Hymowitz T. Soybean genetic resources and crop improvement. Genome. 1999;42:605–616. doi: 10.1139/g99-039. - DOI