Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 7;11(11):1698.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines11111698.

The Safety and Protective Efficacy Evaluation of an Attenuated M. bovis-BoHV-1 Bivalent Vaccine in Rabbits

Affiliations

The Safety and Protective Efficacy Evaluation of an Attenuated M. bovis-BoHV-1 Bivalent Vaccine in Rabbits

Sen Zhang et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a global prevalent multifactorial infection primarily caused by viral and bacterial coinfections. In China, Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) and bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1) are the predominant pathogens associated with BRD. Our previous study involved the development of attenuated M. bovis HB150 and BoHV-1 gG-/tk- vaccine strains, which were thoroughly assessed for their safety profiles and protective efficacy in cattle. In this study, we applied a combination of vaccines in varying ratios and used a rabbit model to determine the safety and protective efficacy. We used PCR/RT-PCR to detect the postimmunization and challenge shedding of M. bovis and BoHV-1. Additionally, we measured antibody titers and the expression of IFN-β and TNF-α to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune responses, respectively. Furthermore, we performed a histopathological analysis to assess lung damage. Our study provides evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the bivalent M. bovis-BoHV-1 vaccine in rabbits, particularly when applying a combination of 1.0 × 108 CFU of M. bovis HB150 and 1.0 × 106 TCID50 of the BoHV-1 gG-/tk- strain. The bivalent vaccine significantly enhanced both the long-term antibody immune response and cellular protection against the M. bovis and BoHV-1 challenge. These findings provide a valuable model for the potential application in cattle.

Keywords: BRD; BoHV-1; M. bovis; attenuated vaccine; protective efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Y.J. is employed by the Spirit JinYu Biological Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Hohhot, China. The re-maining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rectal temperature of experimental rabbits pre- (A) and postchallenge by M. bovis HB0801 (B) and BoHV-1 HB06 (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in the mean body weight of the rabbits in the M. bovis groups (A) and BoHV-1 (B) groups during the entire experimental period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detection of M. bovis HB0801 (A) and BoHV-1 HB06 (B) shedding in nasal swabs after the challenge. Nasal swabs were collected every day.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Humoral immune responses induced by the M. bovis–BoHV-1 bivalent vaccine. Serum samples were collected weekly to determine the (A) M. bovis serum antibody and (B) BoHV-1 serum neutralizing antibody. Variation is expressed as standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Production of IFN-β (A) and TNF-α (B) after immunization. The cytokines were detected with commercial ELISA kits. Results are shown as means ± SEM.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histopathological images of lung tissues from the experimental rabbits stained by H&E. (AC) represent experimental groups with different antigenic ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, respectively. (DF) represent experimental groups of the M. bovis HB150 immunization vaccine, the unvaccinated group, and the blank control group as the negative control.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Histopathological images of lung tissues from the experimental rabbits stained by H&E. (AC) represent experimental groups with different antigenic ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, respectively. (D,E) represent experimental groups of the BoHV-1 gG-/tk- immunization vaccine and unvaccinated groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blakebrough-Hall C., McMeniman J.P., Gonzalez L.A. An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods. J. Anim. Sci. 2020;98:skaa005. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cusack P.M.V. Evaluation of practices used to reduce the incidence of bovine respiratory disease in Australian feedlots (to November 2021) Aust. Vet. J. 2023;101:230–247. doi: 10.1111/avj.13239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Windeyer M.C., Leslie K.E., Godden S.M., Hodgins D.C., Lissemore K.D., LeBlanc S.J. Factors associated with morbidity, mortality, and growth of dairy heifer calves up to 3 months of age. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014;113:231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi N.N., Inzana T.J., Rajagopalan P. Bovine Airway Models: Approaches for Investigating Bovine Respiratory Disease. ACS Infect. Dis. 2023;9:1168–1179. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00618. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dudek K., Szacawa E. Mycoplasma bovis Infections: Occurrence, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Control, Including Prevention and Therapy. Pathogens. 2020;9:994. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9120994. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources