Maintaining innovation: How to make sewer robots and innovation policy work in Barcelona
- PMID: 38006311
- PMCID: PMC11119103
- DOI: 10.1177/03063127231207082
Maintaining innovation: How to make sewer robots and innovation policy work in Barcelona
Abstract
This article explores how innovation logics infiltrate problem and value definitions in maintenance and repair, and how innovation itself depends on considerable, often invisible care work beyond the seemingly smooth entrepreneurial narratives. We build on a growing body of work in STS that investigates the relationship between innovation and maintenance and repair. This literature argues that the obsession with innovation crowds out attention to maintenance, that innovation creates future obligations of maintenance that are often not factored into technological promises, and that ordinary maintenance and repair practices are often innovative in their own right. Empirically, we explore a case where maintenance and repair become the explicit target of high-level, high-tech innovation initiatives and how, as a result, innovation logics colonize maintenance practices. Conceptually, we explore how repair and maintenance sensitivities can be applied to innovation practices to reveal the invisible work needed to align innovation instruments with socio-material and institutional configurations. Drawing on an in-depth case study of sewer inspection robots in Barcelona, we find that attempts to innovate maintenance require a symmetric effort to maintain innovation. In our case study, innovation processes as deployed by the European Commission, research consortia, and companies required substantial repair work to function reliably in specific settings. Our study shows how divergent understandings of the public good in innovation and maintenance contexts may lead to significant tensions, and that much can be gained analytically from not treating innovation and maintenance as opposites.
Keywords: co-creation; innovation; public procurement; repair and maintenance; robotics.
Similar articles
-
Innovation and technology transfer in the health sciences: a cross-sectional perspective.Med Intensiva. 2014 Nov;38(8):492-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Jun 21. Med Intensiva. 2014. PMID: 24958440 English, Spanish.
-
Mechanism of High-Tech Enterprises' Technological Practices Affected by the Split Fault of Knowledge Innovation Network.Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 13;2022:2984136. doi: 10.1155/2022/2984136. eCollection 2022. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35602634 Free PMC article.
-
Organisational innovation and control practices: the case of public-private mix in tuberculosis control in India.Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Jul;36(6):917-31. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12125. Epub 2013 Dec 28. Sociol Health Illn. 2014. PMID: 24372316
-
Understanding innovation in social service delivery systems.Health Mark Q. 1994;11(3-4):61-73. doi: 10.1300/J026v11n03_07. Health Mark Q. 1994. PMID: 10137018 Review.
-
Innovation in hospitals: a survey of the literature.Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Sep;8(3):181-93. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0016-3. Epub 2006 Dec 21. Eur J Health Econ. 2007. PMID: 17186204 Review.
References
-
- Akrich M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker W., Law J. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). The MIT Press.
-
- Akrich M., Callon M., Latour B., Monaghan A. (2002). The key to success in innovation part 2: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–225.
-
- Anand N., Gupta A., Appel H. (Eds.). (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Duke University Press.
-
- Anra Technologies. (2022). Official website. https://www.anratechnologies.com/home/
-
- Appel H., Anand N., Gupta A. (2018). Introduction: Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In Anand N., Appel H., Gupta A. (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 1–38). Duke University Press.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources