Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr;416(9):2247-2259.
doi: 10.1007/s00216-023-05054-2. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

State of the art and future research directions of materials science applied to electrochemical biosensor developments

Affiliations
Review

State of the art and future research directions of materials science applied to electrochemical biosensor developments

Erich Kny et al. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Centralized laboratories in which analytical processes are automated to enable the analysis of large numbers of samples at relatively low cost are used for analytical testing throughout the world. However, healthcare is changing, partly due to the general recognition that care needs to be more patient-centered and putting the patient at the center of action. One way to achieve this goal is to consider point-of-care testing (PoC) devices as alternative analytical concepts. This requires miniaturization of current analytical concepts and the use of cost-effective diagnostic tools with appropriate sensitivity and specificity. Electrochemical sensors are ideally adapted as they provide robust, low-cost, and miniaturized solutions for the detection of variable analytes, yet lack the high sensitivity comparable to more classical diagnosis approaches. Advances in nanotechnology have opened up a plethora of different nanomaterials to be applied as electrode and/or sensing materials in electrochemical biosensors. The choice of materials significantly influences the sensor's sensitivity, selectivity, and overall performance. A critical review of the state of the art with respect to the development of the utilized materials (between 2019 and 2023) and where the field is heading to are the focus of this article.

Keywords: Biosensor; Electrochemistry; Nanomaterials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Wu J, Liu H, Chen W, Ma B, Ju H. Device integration of electrochemical biosensors. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;1(5):346–60. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Grieshaber D, MacKenzie R, Vörös J, Reimhult E. Electrochemical biosensors - sensor principles and architectures. Sensors (Basel). 2008;8(3):1400–58. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Radhakrishnan R, Suni II, Bever CS, Hammock BD. Impedance biosensors: applications to sustainability and remaining technical challenges. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2014;2(7):1649–55. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Heydari-Bafrooei E, Ensafi AA. Nanomaterials-based biosensing strategies for biomarkers diagnosis, a review. Biosens Bioelectron: X. 2023;13: 100245.
    1. Naikoo GA, Awan T, Salim H, Arshad F, Hassan IU, Pedram MZ, et al. Fourth-generation glucose sensors composed of copper nanostructures for diabetes management: a critical review. Bioeng transl med. 2022;7(1): e10248. - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources