Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 May;281(5):2303-2312.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08342-w. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

Auditory capacity of the better-hearing ear in asymmetric hearing loss

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Auditory capacity of the better-hearing ear in asymmetric hearing loss

Iva Speck et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to investigate the course of the hearing capacity of the better-hearing ear in single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) over time, in a multicenter study.

Methods: We included 2086 pure-tone audiograms from 323 patients with SSD and AHL from four hospitals and 156 private practice otorhinolaryngologists. We collected: age, gender, etiology, duration of deafness, treatment with CI, number and monosyllabic speech recognition, numerical rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus intensity, and the tinnitus questionnaire according to Goebel and Hiller. We compared the pure tone audiogram of the better-hearing ear in patients with SSD with age- and gender-controlled hearing thresholds from ISO 7029:2017.

Results: First, individuals with SSD showed a significantly higher hearing threshold from 0.125 to 8 kHz in the better-hearing ear compared to the ISO 7029:2017. The duration of deafness of the poorer-hearing ear showed no relationship with the hearing threshold of the better-hearing ear. The hearing threshold was significantly higher in typically bilaterally presenting etiologies (chronic otitis media, otosclerosis, and congenital hearing loss), except for Menière's disease. Second, subjects that developed AHL did so in 5.19 ± 5.91 years and showed significant reduction in monosyllabic word and number recognition.

Conclusions: Individuals with SSD show significantly poorer hearing in the better-hearing ear than individuals with NH from the ISO 7029:2017. In clinical practice, we should, therefore, inform our SSD patients that their disease is accompanied by a reduced hearing capacity on the contralateral side, especially in certain etiologies.

Keywords: AHL; Asymmetric hearing loss; SSD; Single-sided deafness; Unilateral hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I. Speck reports the following: travel cost reimbursement from MedEl, Financial support for research from KIND. E. Gundlach reports no conflict of interest. S. Schmidt reports no conflict of interest. N. Spyckermann reports no conflict of interest. A. Lesinski-Schiedat reports the following: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement from Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, MedEl, Oticon (alphabetical order). A. Rauch reports no conflict of interest. A. Aschendorff reports the following: advanced Bionics: financial support for research, Medical Advisory Board, travel cost reimbursement; Cochlear: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement; MED-EL: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement; Oticon Medical: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement. K. Thangavelu reports no conflict of interest. K. Reimann reports the following: cochlear: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement; MED-EL: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement. S. Arndt reports the following: advanced Bionics: travel cost reimbursement, financial support for research; Cochlear: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement; MED-EL: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement; Oticon Medical: financial support for research, travel cost reimbursement.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of air-conducted pure-tone thresholds from 0.125 kHz to 8 kHz between subjects with SSD (grey) and age- and gender-controlled hearing thresholds from ISO 7029:2017 (blue). SSD subjects with single-sided deafness; level of significance: *** - p < 0.001; ** - p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation of air-conducted pure-tone thresholds average difference (AC PTA4 difference = PTA4 better-hearing ear—PTA4 from ISO 7029:2017) with duration of deafness in years in subjects with SSD. The AC PTA4 difference is the difference between the individual AC PTA4 of the better-hearing ear of subjects with SSD and age- and gender-controlled hearing thresholds from ISO 7029:2017. SSD subjects with single-sided deafness
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Comparison of the average difference in air-conducted pure-tone thresholds (AC PTA4 difference = PTA4 better-hearing ear—PTA4 from ISO 7029:2017) in relation to etiology in subjects with SSD. The AC PTA4 difference is the difference between the individual AC PTA4 of the better-hearing ear of subjects with SSD and age- and gender-controlled hearing thresholds from ISO 7029:2017. B Comparison of the average difference in air–bone gap pure-tone thresholds (AC PTA4 air–bone gap = PTA4 better-hearing ear—PTA4 from ISO 7029:2017) in relation to etiology in subjects with SSD. SSD subjects with single-sided deafness, TA pure-tone measurements, SHL sudden hearing loss, Schwannoma vestibularis schwannoma, chronic OM chronic otitis media; level of significance: *** - p < 0.001; - ** p < 0.01; * - p < 0.05
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of air-conducted pure-tone thresholds from 0.125 kHz to 8 kHz between non-CI users with SSD (white) and A preoperative pure-tone audiograms of CI users with SSD (grey) and B postoperative pure-tone audiograms of CI users with SSD (grey). SSD subjects with single-sided deafness; level of significance: *** - p < 0.001; ** - p < 0.01; * - p < 0.05
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation of air-conducted pure-tone thresholds average (AC PTA4) with duration of deafness in years in subjects that went from SSD to AHL. AHL asymmetric hearing loss, SSD subjects with single-sided deafness

Similar articles

References

    1. Vincent C, Arndt S, Firszt JB et al (2015) Identification and evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with asymmetrical hearing loss. In: Audiology and Neurotology. S. Karger AG, pp 87–89 - PubMed
    1. Van De Heyning P, Távora-Vieira D, Mertens G, et al. Towards a unified testing framework for single-sided deafness studies: a consensus paper. Audiol Neurotol. 2017;21:391–398. doi: 10.1159/000455058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arndt S, Wesarg T, Stelzig Y, et al. Influence of single-sided deafness on the auditory capacity of the better ear. German version. HNO. 2019;67:739–749. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00730-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hueb MM, Goycoolea MV, Paparella MM, Oliveira JA. Otosclerosis: the University of Minnesota temporal bone collection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;105:396–405. doi: 10.1177/019459989110500308. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sabbe A, Verhaert N, Joosen A. Otosclerosis: shift in bone conduction after stapedectomy. B-ENT. 2015;11:183–189. - PubMed

Publication types