Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry
- PMID: 3800748
- DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035
Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry
Abstract
Duration, reliability, and sensitivity of kinetic thresholds were evaluated for the I/4e, I/2e, and I/1e Goldmann-equivalent targets as a function of stimulus velocity (1 degrees to 8 degrees/s) using the SQUID automated perimeter. For all targets, the average duration of kinetic meridional scans decreased significantly as stimulus velocity increased from 1 degrees to 4 degrees/s. Minimal reductions in kinetic scan times were present for stimulus velocities above 4 degrees/s. All targets appeared to have reductions in sensitivity at velocities above 4 degrees/s (target detection occurring at more central visual field locations) that were presumably related to the observers' reaction times. There were no consistent differences in the variability of kinetic thresholds for different stimulus velocities. When all factors were considered, a stimulus velocity of 4 degrees/s seemed to be optimal for kinetic scans of all targets in the central and peripheral visual field.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.Vision Res. 2014 May;98:83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Vision Res. 2014. PMID: 24705075
-
Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction.Vision Res. 2001 Jul;41(16):2157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00088-8. Vision Res. 2001. PMID: 11403799
-
Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Mar 5;56(3):2092-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16182. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25744980
-
Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.J Vis. 2016 Nov 1;16(14):5. doi: 10.1167/16.14.5. J Vis. 2016. PMID: 27829104
-
Learning effect and repeatability of automated kinetic perimetry in healthy participants.Curr Eye Res. 2014 Sep;39(9):928-37. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.888450. Epub 2014 Mar 3. Curr Eye Res. 2014. PMID: 24588228
Cited by
-
Does intraocular straylight predict night driving visual performance? Correlations between straylight levels and contrast sensitivity, halo size, and hazard recognition distance with and without glare.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 13;16:910620. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910620. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36177386 Free PMC article.
-
K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;244(10):1300-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0291-9. Epub 2006 Mar 21. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16550404
-
Effects of different levels of intraocular stray light on kinetic perimetry findings.PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0127159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127159. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25965816 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Static and Kinetic Perimetry Results are Eliminated in Retinal Disease when Psychophysical Procedures are Equated.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 1;7(5):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.22. eCollection 2018 Sep. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 30280007 Free PMC article.
-
The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry.J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Oct;83(10):895-8. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991. PMID: 1800764 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources