Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec 1;82(12):1678-1695.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad143.

Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

Hajara Aslam  1 , Mojtaba Lotfaliany  2 , Daniel So  3 , Kirsten Berding  4 , Michael Berk  1   5   6   7   8 , Tetyana Rocks  1 , Meghan Hockey  1 , Felice N Jacka  1   9   10 , Wolfgang Marx  1 , John F Cryan  5   11 , Heidi M Staudacher  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

Hajara Aslam et al. Nutr Rev. .

Abstract

Context: Dietary fibers hold potential to influence depressive and anxiety outcomes by modulating the microbiota-gut-brain axis, which is increasingly recognized as an underlying factor in mental health maintenance.

Objective: Evidence for the effects of fibers on depressive and anxiety outcomes remains unclear. To this end, a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis were conducted that included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Data sources: The PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases were searched for eligible studies.

Data extraction: Study screening and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers.

Data analysis: Meta-analyses via random effects models were performed to examine the (1) association between fiber intake and depressive and anxiety outcomes in observational studies, and (2) effect of fiber intervention on depressive and anxiety outcomes compared with placebo in RCTs. A total of 181 405 participants were included in 23 observational studies. In cross-sectional studies, an inverse association was observed between fiber intake and depressive (Cohen's d effect size [d]: -0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.16, -0.05) and anxiety (d = -0.25; 95%CI, -0.38, -0.12) outcomes. In longitudinal studies, there was an inverse association between fiber intake and depressive outcomes (d = -0.07; 95%CI, -0.11, -0.04). In total, 740 participants were included in 10 RCTs, all of whom used fiber supplements. Of note, only 1 RCT included individuals with a clinical diagnosis of depression. No difference was found between fiber supplementation and placebo for depressive (d = -0.47; 95%CI, -1.26, 0.31) or anxiety (d = -0.30; 95%CI, -0.67, 0.07) outcomes.

Conclusion: Although observational data suggest a potential benefit for higher fiber intake for depressive and anxiety outcomes, evidence from current RCTs does not support fiber supplementation for improving depressive or anxiety outcomes. More research, including RCTs in clinical populations and using a broad range of fibers, is needed.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021274898.

Keywords: anxiety; depression; dietary fiber; gut microbiota; prebiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of observational studies investigating the association between fiber intake and depressive outcomes by study design. Box size represents study weight and diamonds represent overall effect sizes and 95%CIs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of cross-sectional studies investigating the association between fiber intake and anxiety outcomes. Box size represents study weight and diamonds represent overall effect sizes and 95%CIs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of fiber supplementation on depressive outcomes. Box size represents study weight and diamonds represent overall effect sizes and 95%CIs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of fiber supplementation on anxiety outcomes. Box size represents study weight and diamonds represent overall effect sizes and 95%CIs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Marx W, Lane M, Hockey M, et al.Diet and depression: exploring the biological mechanisms of action. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:134–150. - PubMed
    1. Berding K, Vlckova K, Marx W, et al.Diet and the microbiota–gut–brain axis: sowing the seeds of good mental health. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:1239–1285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Grady J, O'Connor EM, Shanahan F.. Dietary fibre in the era of microbiome science. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49:506–515. - PubMed
    1. Augustin LSA, Aas A-M, Astrup A, et al.Dietary fibre consensus from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). Nutrients. 2020;12:2553. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holscher HD. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:172–184. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms