Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning
- PMID: 38008218
- PMCID: PMC11070304
- DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.11.010
Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate multiple machine learning (ML) models for predicting 2-year visual acuity (VA) responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Treatments Trials (CATT) for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD).
Design: Secondary analysis of public data from a randomized clinical trial.
Participants: A total of 1029 CATT participants who completed 2 years of follow-up with untreated active nAMD and baseline VA between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye.
Methods: Five ML models (support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron neural network, and lasso) were applied to clinical and image data from baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 for predicting 4 VA outcomes (≥ 15-letter VA gain, ≥ 15-letter VA loss, VA change from baseline, and actual VA) at 2 years. The CATT data from 1029 participants were randomly split for training (n = 717), from which the models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation, and for final validation on a test data set (n = 312).
Main outcome measures: Performances of ML models were assessed by R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting VA change from baseline and actual VA at 2 years, by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss from baseline.
Results: Using training data up to week 12, the ML models from cross-validation achieved mean R2 of 0.24 to 0.29 (MAE = 9.1-9.8 letters) for predicting VA change and 0.37 to 0.41 (MAE = 9.3-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years. The mean AUCs for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss at 2 years was 0.84 to 0.85 and 0.58 to 0.73, respectively. In final validation on the test data set up to week 12, the models had an R2 of 0.33 to 0.38 (MAE = 8.9-9.9 letters) for predicting VA change, an R2 of 0.37 to 0.45 (MAE = 8.8-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years, and AUCs of 0.85 to 0.87 and 0.67 to 0.79 for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss, respectively.
Conclusions: Machine learning models have the potential to predict 2-year VA response to anti-VEGF treatment using clinical and imaging features from the loading dose phase, which can aid in decision-making around treatment protocols for patients with nAMD.
Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration; Anti-VEGF therapy; Machine learning; Prediction; Visual acuity.
Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Predicting Visual Acuity by Using Machine Learning in Patients Treated for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1028-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.034. Epub 2018 Feb 14. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29454659
-
Visual Acuity Outcomes and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Intensity in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients: A Real-World Analysis of 49 485 Eyes.Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 25. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020. PMID: 31324588
-
Evaluation of Multiple Machine Learning Models for Predicting Number of Anti-VEGF Injections in the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials (CATT).Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.1.18. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 36633874 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32633861 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 4;3(3):CD005139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005139.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30834517 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;73(Suppl 1):S66-S71. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24. Epub 2024 Dec 24. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39723867 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 30;8(1):486. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01886-7. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40731070 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-driven prediction of cycloplegic refractive error in Chinese children.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 May 22;13:1608494. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1608494. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025. PMID: 40476001 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error and Myopia Status Based on Non-Cycloplegic Data in Chinese Students.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 1;13(8):16. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.16. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 39120886 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminative, generative artificial intelligence, and foundation models in retina imaging.Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 28;14(4):473-485. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00064. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39803410 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources