Comparison of intra-operative outcomes following internal fixation with trochanteric stabilisation plate or intramedullary nail in intertrochanteric fractures
- PMID: 38008823
- PMCID: PMC10857956
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03779-5
Comparison of intra-operative outcomes following internal fixation with trochanteric stabilisation plate or intramedullary nail in intertrochanteric fractures
Abstract
Purpose: Intertrochanteric fractures can be classified as stable (AO-OTA 31-A1) or unstable (AO-OTA 31-A2/3). For A3 fractures there is no recommended treatment, often fixed with either an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a dynamic hip screw and trochanteric stabilisation plate (DHS/TSP). This study retrospectively reviews peri-operative outcomes of patients treated with either fixator.
Methods: Pre-operative demographics, operative information and patient outcome data from 213 patients who suffered intertrochanteric fractures and were treated with either DHS/TSP or IMN at a major trauma centre from 01/2015 to 01/2022 was collected. Unpaired T tests were performed to assess levels of significance between peri-operative outcomes.
Results: The mean age for DHS/TSP-treated patients was 2.63 years greater than IMN-treated (P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences in pre-operative characteristics. We found a significantly shorter mean operative time in the DHS/TSP group (88.05 min, 95% CI: 82.1-94.0) compared to IMN counterparts (100.8 min, 95% CI: 92.7-109.0, P = 0.012), but no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay or patient mortality, blood transfusion, re-operation or complication rates. When A3 fractures were analysed, a statistically significant greater proportion of IMN patients required blood transfusions (DHS/TSP: 35.90%, IMN: 65.00%, P = 0.0093). All other factors were found to have no significant differences.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support the national guidelines regarding A1 fractures and suggests that DHS/TSP is a valid alternative to the IMN in A3 intertrochanteric fractures, with reduced blood loss. With the flexibility to add the TSP intraoperatively to prevent femoral head medialisation, and cheaper implant costs, the DHS/TSP may become the preferred method of internal fixation.
Keywords: Internal fixation; Intertrochanteric fracture; Intramedullary nail; Trochanteric stabilisation plate.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic Hip Screw with Trochanter-Stabilizing Plate Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation as a Treatment for Unstable AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Aug 18;2020:1896935. doi: 10.1155/2020/1896935. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32923477 Free PMC article.
-
Is the increased use of intramedullary nailing over DHS for intertrochanteric hip fractures justified? - A review of the Irish hip fracture database 2016 -2020.Surgeon. 2024 Feb;22(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Surgeon. 2024. PMID: 37793947 Review.
-
Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1435-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02895-4. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021. PMID: 33590318 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 May;12(4):241-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199805000-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9619458 Clinical Trial.
-
Cephalo-medullary nailing versus dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilisation plate for the treatment of unstable per-trochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02193-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33430910 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nutrient foramina of human fibula: morphometric analysis and clinical relevance.J Bone Miner Metab. 2025 Mar;43(2):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s00774-024-01568-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2. J Bone Miner Metab. 2025. PMID: 39623083
-
[Factors associated with physical dependency in adults with hip fracture].Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 May 6;62(3):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10998873. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024. PMID: 39528413 Free PMC article. Spanish.
References
-
- NICE (2017) The management of hip fracture in adults. [Online] Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-18308...
-
- Amer KM, Congiusta DV, Smith B, Jain K, Shaath MK, Dalcortivo RL, Ahmed IH, Vosbikian MM. Cephalomedullary nailing has a higher reoperation rate compared to sliding hip screw fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2023;11(10):595–604. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.64311.3088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bretherton CP, Parker MJ. Femoral Medialization, fixation failures, and functional outcome in trochanteric hip fractures treated with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary nail from within a randomized trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(12):642–646. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000689. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Raman DDT, Vignesh DA, Swaminathan DS. Clinico-radiological results of unstable trochanteric fractures treated with custom-made trochanteric stabilisation plate and dynamic hip screw (DHS) Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(3):308–313. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i3f.56. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous