Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023;12(4):267-276.
doi: 10.14283/jfa.2022.42.

Preoperative Rehabilitation Is Feasible in the Weeks Prior to Surgery and Significantly Improves Functional Performance

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Preoperative Rehabilitation Is Feasible in the Weeks Prior to Surgery and Significantly Improves Functional Performance

D E Hall et al. J Frailty Aging. 2023.

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a multidimensional state of increased vulnerability. Frail patients are at increased risk for poor surgical outcomes. Prior research demonstrates that rehabilitation strategies deployed after surgery improve outcomes by building strength.

Objectives: Examine the feasibility and impact of a novel, multi-faceted prehabilitation intervention for frail patients before surgery.

Design: Single arm clinical trial.

Setting: Veterans Affairs hospital.

Participants: Patients preparing for major abdominal, urological, thoracic, or cardiac surgery with frailty identified as a Risk Analysis Index≥30.

Intervention: Prehabilitation started in a supervised setting to establish safety and then transitioned to home-based exercise with weekly telephone coaching by exercise physiologists. Prehabilitation included (a)strength and coordination training; (b)respiratory muscle training (IMT); (c)aerobic conditioning; and (d)nutritional coaching and supplementation. Prehabilitation length was tailored to the 4-6 week time lag typically preceding each participant's normally scheduled surgery.

Measurements: Functional performance and patient surveys were assessed at baseline, every other week during prehabilitation, and then 30 and 90 days after surgery. Within-person changes were estimated using linear mixed models.

Results: 43 patients completed baseline assessments; 36(84%) completed a median 5(range 3-10) weeks of prehabilitation before surgery; 32(74%) were retained through 90-day follow-up. Baseline function was relatively low. Exercise logs show participants completed 94% of supervised exercise, 78% of prescribed IMT and 74% of home-based exercise. Between baseline and day of surgery, timed-up-and-go decreased 2.3 seconds, gait speed increased 0.1 meters/second, six-minute walk test increased 41.7 meters, and the time to complete 5 chair rises decreased 1.6 seconds(all P≤0.007). Maximum and mean inspiratory and expiratory pressures increased 4.5, 7.3, 14.1 and 13.5 centimeters of water, respectively(all P≤0.041).

Conclusions: Prehabilitation is feasible before major surgery and achieves clinically meaningful improvements in functional performance that may impact postoperative outcomes and recovery. These data support rationale for a larger trial powered to detect differences in postoperative outcomes.

Keywords: Frailty; prehabilitation; rehabilitation; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Portions of these data were presented at the 2021 ICFSR (virtual) on September 29, 2021. Dr. Hall reports a consulting relationship with FutureAssure, LLC. Dr. Wilson reports grants from Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development during the conduct of the study. Authors Youk, Allsup, Kennedy, Byard, Dhupar, Chu, Rahman, Cahalin, Afilalo, and Forman declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient Recruitment 112 eligible patients were approached to enroll 46, but 3 withdrew prior to baseline assessments for an effective recruitment rate of 38% (43/112). Of these, 7 withdrew and 36 completed prehabilitation and had surgery for an 85% (36/43) interval retention rate. Of these 32 completed assessments on postoperative day 90 yielding a 74% (32/43) overall retention rate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDermid RC, Bagshaw SM. Physiological Reserve and Frailty in Critical Illness. In: Textbook of Post-ICU Medicine: The Legacy of Critical Care. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2014. doi:10.1093/med/9780199653461.003.0028. - DOI
    1. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. Jun 2006;54(6):991–100, doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age and ageing. Mar 2012;41(2):142–7, doi:10.1093/ageing/afr182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. Mar 2 2013;381(9868):752–6, Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 03/19 2014;9:433–44, Doi: 10.2147/CIA.S45300. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources